On CBS.com: Play Survivor Video Trivia Now
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 27 of 35:
Next »
« Previous
but but
Read the paragraphs in question between Novell and the Santa Cruz Organization (which is NOT the SCO group that McBride heads up).

http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20031119011337666&title=Novell+responds&type=article&order=&pid=24052

--------------
(2) subject to paragraphs B and C of this Section II, to sublicense and distribute, and authorize its customers to sublicense and distribute, such Licensed Technology and modifications thereof, in source and binary form; provided, however, that (i) such technology and modifications may be sublicensed and/or distributed by NOVELL solely as part of a bundled or integrated offering ("Composite Offering"); (ii) such Composite Offering shall not be directly competitive with core application server offerings of SCO, and (iii) the Licensed Technology shall not constitute a primary portion of the value of such Composite Offering. SCO understands and acknowledges that such restrictions on sublicensing and/or distribution shall not affect any rights specifically retained by NOVELL under the Asset Purchase Agreement, including but not limited to rights under Transitional Contracts.

B. In the event of a Change of Control of SCO, and commencing with the effective date of such Change of Control, the proviso in subparagraph IIA(2) setting forth restrictions on the sublicense and/or distribution of Licensed Technology and modifications thereof shall cease to exist.
Posted by: mobrien_12@...   Posted on: 11/19/03 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

It's all fun until someone loses an eye  LinuxHippie | 11/19/03
What?  OhMyGosh | 11/19/03
You want legal  Patrick Jones | 11/19/03
Now finish the sentence  John Dulles | 11/20/03
finish the sentence ??? How about you get to LAW-101  Terfenol_D | 11/20/03
OK  John Dulles | 11/20/03
Missed it.  LinuxHippie | 11/20/03
why would you want to  lmaxwell | 11/20/03
Philosophically....  John Dulles | 11/20/03
Novell is wrong I believe..  Mike Cox | 11/19/03
LOL  Arrg | 11/19/03
LOL  SC-man | 11/20/03
ROTHLMAO  B.O.F.H. | 11/19/03
Quick!!!  BitTwiddler | 11/19/03
McPride  lotta_anger | 11/20/03
Poker or Baseball  John Dulles | 11/20/03
Ok.....  Delaware Boy | 11/19/03
SCO has no need for Developers  voska | 11/19/03
Re: OK.....  issthatso | 11/20/03
It's not about software anymore....  Zen37 | 11/19/03
Of course it will !  BitTwiddler | 11/19/03
SCO Group did NOT buy anything from novell!  mobrien_12@... | 11/19/03
Uh huh, anything you say.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/19/03
mobrien_12 is correct  dgingras@... | 11/19/03
SCO has no clue...  No_Ax_to_Grind - | 11/19/03
but...  ryusen | 11/19/03
but but  mobrien_12@... | 11/19/03
or as ZZ would be saying right about now...  Dave P. | 11/19/03
BUT.. This is different  slopoke | 11/20/03
One little detail  Yagotta B. Kidding | 11/19/03
Not like McBride would have noticed  Dave P. | 11/19/03
David Boies = Devil?s Advocate (?)  Vily Clay | 11/19/03
Did you say, eight-year non-compete deal...  Robert Carnegie | 11/20/03
Unenforceable eight year non compete  realgomer | 11/20/03
In other news  Arrg | 11/20/03

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc