BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 29 of 82:
Next »
« Previous
OS/2
You might want to check the history of OS/2 and who IBM hired to help them write it.
http://www.os2bbs.com/os2news/OS2History.html

Granted, IBM did not have the marketing skills that Microsoft has and that is part of the reason OS/2 died.
Posted by: Patrick Jones   Posted on: 09/28/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Go ahead... eat the apple.. it will be OK...  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/27/04
You mean like IBM?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/27/04
Good one Ax!  Confused by religion | 09/27/04
Is his miscomparison good or his loyal Microsoftie-ness?  Jeff Spicoli | 09/27/04
Here's the difference.  Linux_Developer | 09/28/04
IBM had to embrace OSS  dj_45_cal | 09/28/04
Not quite.  Anton Philidor | 09/28/04
Yes, IBM enjoys an illegal unethical monopoly  Jeff Spicoli | 09/27/04
IBM tried  V Sanders | 09/27/04
You are either a child or have a very short memory.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/27/04
Why?  Martin Marvinski | 09/27/04
Bingo  Jeff Spicoli | 09/28/04
One point  rapson | 09/28/04
One major difference...  MacCanuck | 09/28/04
Another major difference  Anton Philidor | 09/28/04
No insult intended.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
Just like MS  nomorems | 09/28/04
A bit, but then a bit not...  John Le'Brecage | 09/27/04
Oh I grant they have their smiling face on,,,, today.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/27/04
Rhetoric...  Martin Marvinski | 09/27/04
IBM Historical context  B.O.F.H. | 09/27/04
Good lord Martin, your talking about PCs.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
PC was open architecture because IBM was in hurry  voska | 09/28/04
voska, you are dead wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
How about the present?  Roger Ramjet | 09/28/04
Pfft~  nomorems | 09/28/04
Microsoft was CONVICTED, IBM was NOT convicted (NT)  Update victim | 09/28/04
Because...  dj_45_cal | 09/28/04
OS/2  Patrick Jones | 09/28/04
The real reason OS/2 died was cost  voska | 09/28/04
No, it died because it didn't have win32 extentions  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
And it didn't have those extentions because?  Patrick Jones | 09/28/04
Because they didn't want to pay the license fee.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
[sigh] Irrelevant.  Linux_Developer | 09/28/04
Standard Oil is a good comparison, to a point.  Anton Philidor | 09/28/04
There's give and take with the community...  chiwawa | 09/27/04
Come on...  Martin Marvinski | 09/27/04
No...  chiwawa | 09/28/04
So Microsoft is now venturing into the open source arena?  B.O.F.H. | 09/27/04
Outstanding, an original post.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
Well there goes open source  FilledOut | 09/27/04
The MS Illusion  Immortal_z | 09/30/04
ms may one day go linux  V Sanders | 09/27/04
Ooh.. the ABMers are out tonight  d_jedi | 09/27/04
Also notice MS software is in the TOP 5% of downloads.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/27/04
Weren't you the one . . .  Roger Ramjet | 09/28/04
Haha...then you contradict d_jedi's statement.  Linux_Developer | 09/28/04
Counting FIXES and PATCHES? .(NT)  Update victim | 09/28/04
I guess reading the article was too much for you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
You overreact...  Martin Marvinski | 09/27/04
Yes, yes they are  NonZealot | 09/27/04
It's because...  rapson | 09/28/04
Charity  Patrick Jones | 09/28/04
"ABMers" or Trolls?  Linux_Developer | 09/28/04
Who said I was a troll?  Jeff Spicoli | 09/28/04
People who don't know an ogre when they see one  Anton Philidor | 09/28/04
Wish I could edit...  Anton Philidor | 09/28/04
Um, becaue yiu raise your hand at every opportunity.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
And how are you any different??...  Jeff Spicoli | 09/28/04
Sorry but you are dead wrong Jeff.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
ABMers and NBMers are trolls..  d_jedi | 09/28/04
Agreed We shoujld all be willing and ready to call  Laff | 09/28/04
With an eye to Apple  Anton Philidor | 09/28/04
Simple: MS has Shown itself to not be Trustworthy  brenthawkinsmd | 09/28/04
Spot On~  nomorems | 09/28/04
Millions say you are wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
Now what are the odds that MS would have done  Laff | 09/28/04
About the same as Linux using a GUI if they didn't have MS.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
Nice Try  Patrick Jones | 09/28/04
Ah, but was it popular?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
Wrong wording..  Patrick Jones | 09/28/04
And Linux needs...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
True.  Patrick Jones | 09/28/04
The Linux GUIS is a derived from other sources.  B.O.F.H. | 09/28/04
And???? No one cares...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04
Actually, it is only GNOME and KDE that are emulating Windows!  B.O.F.H. | 09/28/04
enough with the shared source  alterego_z | 09/28/04
ZDNET - Have you noticed a lot of stories with NO comments?  BitTwiddler | 09/28/04
They're too stupid to fix it.  d_jedi | 09/28/04
exactly....  Monkey_MCSE | 09/28/04
MS trying to proprietize  hayesk | 09/28/04
Isn't that how all for-profits work.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/28/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here