On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 29 of 90:
Next »
« Previous
You lost me
"No, there was a very specific reason why I chose that particular nickname. Look back on your flaps with No_Ax, and you might begin to get an idea of what I'm talking about."

I honestly don't know what you're referring to. Can you elaborate further?

"Now maybe you could explain to me why you're here doing what you're doing."

The exact same thing you are, no?

"You just sit here, making blatantly offensive posts, and ripping to shreds anyone who disagrees with you."

Actually I have not been doing that. Can you point to some posts (current ones, not ones from six months ago) where I display this behavior? What have I said that's so offensive? Show me where I "ripped someone to shreds" merely for not agreeing with what I've said?

"When you get banned, you jump back on with a different nick, and you even encourage the same behavior in other users!"

Again, point out a current post where I encourage "advanced trolling" please.

"What on earth are you trying to accomplish by all this?"

I think this question is better directed at you, my friend. After all, I haven't stated what my official stance is on ZDNet like you have ("to promote thought and discussion"), so I have nothing that I'm swaying from. You, however, claim to be here to promote thought and yet have had nothing to say to me except threatening to try to ban me again, asking what I'm doing, etc. And take note: I did not post anything to you recently that has been remotely offensive or trollish. And yet you saw me chatting with someone else, butted in, and basically started off with "I know it's you Bobby, and here are some of your past offensive posts", as though what happened months ago is so ultimately relevant to today.
So I ask: what are you doing here? You're certainly not promoting anything thought-provoking or relevant in my mind. In fact, you now seem to be this person that you claim to detest. You are attacking me (obviously it seems because of a chip you've kept on your shoulder from arguing with Bobby in the past), and yet I have done nothing to you. Care to answer my accusation?..
Posted by: Jeff Spicoli   Posted on: 09/16/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Message has been deleted.  realitycheck101 | 09/15/04
In their comparison...  doe_z | 09/15/04
They will LOSE this bloodbath  Jeff Spicoli | 09/15/04
This has always been MS's strategy  gsbtech | 09/16/04
Let's look at the teams  Chad_z | 09/15/04
Re: Let's look at the teams  P. Douglas | 09/16/04
The war is over  Chad_z | 09/16/04
Open Source or not will be meaningless in the future  voska | 09/16/04
Someone had to write the Holodeck program  The King's Servant | 09/16/04
Oh yes, let's do!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
You sound like one of those Mainframe types back when the PC came out!  B.O.F.H. | 09/16/04
What are you ranting about?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
No rant needed!  B.O.F.H. | 09/16/04
You are blind to facts  balsover | 09/16/04
Wishful thinking?  serpentmage | 09/15/04
Taylor probably talks to existing MS customers  balsover | 09/16/04
Yawn, any product annoucements? No just another plan.  Richard Flude | 09/15/04
Linux expert working for MS  crocd | 09/16/04
Ever heard of double agents?(nt)  Harry Butts | 09/16/04
Linux is not a religion  balsover | 09/16/04
They could be paying him a fortune, and having fun playing with them.  DonnieBoy | 09/16/04
ms cool? that would be the day  dogfoamatmouth | 09/16/04
Great Post  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
Sure, bobby  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
The one and only former Bobby Sskcat at your service!  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
Whoa...too much of this and you'll get banned...again.  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
oh OK  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
As for the nick, it wasn't a mistake.  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
You lost me  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
Re: You lost me  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
We can only hope he is.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Please...  nomorems | 09/16/04
Yeah  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
regulars...  Brasonte | 09/24/04
Only way MS can directly attack Linux rivals  FilledOut | 09/16/04
This is great! Now we can know sooner WHEN Microsoft lies!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/16/04
Never say never  Michael Kelly | 09/16/04
MS Attacks  Unicornrider | 09/16/04
Microsoft's problem  alterego_z | 09/16/04
Safe Mode  christie_z | 09/26/04
You know you've arived when MS starts attacking you!  Laff | 09/16/04
People would buy Linux if it sucked less.  chrislovesdana | 09/16/04
Ah there you have it...Linux biggest strength  Laff | 09/16/04
yes and no  gsbtech | 09/16/04
Well in "theory" MS could make the next one WORK!  Laff | 09/16/04
exactly  gsbtech | 09/16/04
That's a pretty one-sided argument!  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
Hmmm, and so is yours.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Novel lost thier market  voska | 09/16/04
So your saying they did a horrible job of marketing...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Not exactly  balsover | 09/16/04
I remember a different reason why  The King's Servant | 09/16/04
Hmmm, and yours doesn't fare much better  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
Of course there's more sides  seosamh_z | 09/16/04
Awww  nomorems | 09/16/04
AMEN, BROTHER CHRISLOVESDANA!!!  Sniper_z | 09/16/04
Linux reputation suffers when viewed from vendors  Roger Ramjet | 09/16/04
That was the most actuate post I have seen to date.  balsover | 09/16/04
Astute, too.  Anton Philidor | 09/16/04
I work for the Largest employer in the world  zuesse | 09/16/04
Wolf can buy a sheep skin but it won?t change his personality (NT)  Vily Clay | 09/16/04
The usual crowd, the usual rants.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
huh?  gsbtech | 09/16/04
Please...  nomorems | 09/16/04
Hmmm, so why is WIndows taking more servers than Linux from Unix?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Can't say I've noticed that  voska | 09/16/04
exactly  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
Take a read at netcraft.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Netcraft results  B.O.F.H. | 09/16/04
now all servers are web servers? (NT)  doh123 | 09/16/04
Weak argument  AmusedAtItAll | 09/16/04
depends on the market  gsbtech | 09/16/04
I Agree with you on one thing....  computer_man | 09/16/04
Source Please  rpmyers1 | 09/16/04
http://news.netcraft.com/  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Let's look at those numbers, shall we?  rpmyers1 | 09/16/04
Knuts  nomorems | 09/16/04
OS/2's demise MS's dirty trick?  balsover | 09/16/04
Like, "overweight, doughnut eating, open-source boneheads".  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
Yup, name calling is used on both sides.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
That's not relevant  AmusedAtItAll | 09/16/04
I see this that way.  computer_man | 09/16/04
Ot the moderators start doing their job.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
It also means  nomorems | 09/16/04
I think this is called "negative campaigning"  John L. Ries | 09/16/04
Companies will ",,, seek out non-commercial sources"?  Anton Philidor | 09/16/04
I said "at most"  John L. Ries | 09/17/04
I don't understand the 'coolness' factor  AmusedAtItAll | 09/16/04
touche`  Monkey_MCSE | 09/16/04
Doesn't public acknowledgement of this tactic weaken MS  zuesse | 09/16/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More