On CBS MoneyWatch: How much sleep do you really need?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 90:
Next »
Message has been deleted.
Posted by: realitycheck101   Posted on: 09/15/04  (Edited: 09/16/2004 @ 08:50) You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Message has been deleted.  realitycheck101 | 09/15/04
In their comparison...  doe_z | 09/15/04
They will LOSE this bloodbath  Jeff Spicoli | 09/15/04
This has always been MS's strategy  gsbtech | 09/16/04
Let's look at the teams  Chad_z | 09/15/04
Re: Let's look at the teams  P. Douglas | 09/16/04
The war is over  Chad_z | 09/16/04
Open Source or not will be meaningless in the future  voska | 09/16/04
Someone had to write the Holodeck program  The King's Servant | 09/16/04
Oh yes, let's do!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
You sound like one of those Mainframe types back when the PC came out!  B.O.F.H. | 09/16/04
What are you ranting about?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
No rant needed!  B.O.F.H. | 09/16/04
You are blind to facts  balsover | 09/16/04
Wishful thinking?  serpentmage | 09/15/04
Taylor probably talks to existing MS customers  balsover | 09/16/04
Yawn, any product annoucements? No just another plan.  Richard Flude | 09/15/04
Linux expert working for MS  crocd | 09/16/04
Ever heard of double agents?(nt)  Harry Butts | 09/16/04
Linux is not a religion  balsover | 09/16/04
They could be paying him a fortune, and having fun playing with them.  DonnieBoy | 09/16/04
ms cool? that would be the day  dogfoamatmouth | 09/16/04
Great Post  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
Sure, bobby  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
The one and only former Bobby Sskcat at your service!  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
Whoa...too much of this and you'll get banned...again.  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
oh OK  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
As for the nick, it wasn't a mistake.  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
You lost me  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
Re: You lost me  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
We can only hope he is.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Please...  nomorems | 09/16/04
Yeah  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
regulars...  Brasonte | 09/24/04
Only way MS can directly attack Linux rivals  FilledOut | 09/16/04
This is great! Now we can know sooner WHEN Microsoft lies!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/16/04
Never say never  Michael Kelly | 09/16/04
MS Attacks  Unicornrider | 09/16/04
Microsoft's problem  alterego_z | 09/16/04
Safe Mode  christie_z | 09/26/04
You know you've arived when MS starts attacking you!  Laff | 09/16/04
People would buy Linux if it sucked less.  chrislovesdana | 09/16/04
Ah there you have it...Linux biggest strength  Laff | 09/16/04
yes and no  gsbtech | 09/16/04
Well in "theory" MS could make the next one WORK!  Laff | 09/16/04
exactly  gsbtech | 09/16/04
That's a pretty one-sided argument!  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
Hmmm, and so is yours.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Novel lost thier market  voska | 09/16/04
So your saying they did a horrible job of marketing...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Not exactly  balsover | 09/16/04
I remember a different reason why  The King's Servant | 09/16/04
Hmmm, and yours doesn't fare much better  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
Of course there's more sides  seosamh_z | 09/16/04
Awww  nomorems | 09/16/04
AMEN, BROTHER CHRISLOVESDANA!!!  Sniper_z | 09/16/04
Linux reputation suffers when viewed from vendors  Roger Ramjet | 09/16/04
That was the most actuate post I have seen to date.  balsover | 09/16/04
Astute, too.  Anton Philidor | 09/16/04
I work for the Largest employer in the world  zuesse | 09/16/04
Wolf can buy a sheep skin but it won?t change his personality (NT)  Vily Clay | 09/16/04
The usual crowd, the usual rants.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
huh?  gsbtech | 09/16/04
Please...  nomorems | 09/16/04
Hmmm, so why is WIndows taking more servers than Linux from Unix?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Can't say I've noticed that  voska | 09/16/04
exactly  Jeff Spicoli | 09/16/04
Take a read at netcraft.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Netcraft results  B.O.F.H. | 09/16/04
now all servers are web servers? (NT)  doh123 | 09/16/04
Weak argument  AmusedAtItAll | 09/16/04
depends on the market  gsbtech | 09/16/04
I Agree with you on one thing....  computer_man | 09/16/04
Source Please  rpmyers1 | 09/16/04
http://news.netcraft.com/  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
Let's look at those numbers, shall we?  rpmyers1 | 09/16/04
Knuts  nomorems | 09/16/04
OS/2's demise MS's dirty trick?  balsover | 09/16/04
Like, "overweight, doughnut eating, open-source boneheads".  Linux_Developer | 09/16/04
Yup, name calling is used on both sides.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
That's not relevant  AmusedAtItAll | 09/16/04
I see this that way.  computer_man | 09/16/04
Ot the moderators start doing their job.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/16/04
It also means  nomorems | 09/16/04
I think this is called "negative campaigning"  John L. Ries | 09/16/04
Companies will ",,, seek out non-commercial sources"?  Anton Philidor | 09/16/04
I said "at most"  John L. Ries | 09/17/04
I don't understand the 'coolness' factor  AmusedAtItAll | 09/16/04
touche`  Monkey_MCSE | 09/16/04
Doesn't public acknowledgement of this tactic weaken MS  zuesse | 09/16/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here