On UrbanBaby: Is it OK to breastfeed in public?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 14 of 17:
Next »
« Previous
check out my post below.
it seems to me that the suit right now is based on a different issue than just copying a stupid hash patent, which i agree should be invalidated.

other than that.. i don't see myself as supporting it, only laughing at the irony of it.
Posted by: ryusen   Posted on: 09/09/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I hope  Linux User 147560 | 09/08/04
Dying last gasp for survival?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
I agree!  sa_z | 09/09/04
$509,000 in cash on hand. Bywahahahahaha  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/09/04
Patents!  sa_z | 09/09/04
so are you saying they will lose because they do not have enough money  V Sanders | 09/09/04
Ax isn't saying anything.  sa_z | 09/09/04
I wouldn't doubt that..  d_jedi | 09/09/04
Just calling them on their own hypocrisy  tic swayback | 09/09/04
No-Ax was talking about AltNet (NT)  Anton Philidor | 09/09/04
Regardless  tic swayback | 09/09/04
A couple of points in favor of the suit.  Anton Philidor | 09/09/04
Why support Altnet?  rapson | 09/09/04
check out my post below.  ryusen | 09/09/04
if they are not breaking the law  V Sanders | 09/09/04
guys.. don't miss this part of the article...  ryusen | 09/09/04
Copyright Infringement  tgrady | 09/10/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement