nuturing ActiveX is necessary for MS
gsbtech | 09/03/04
|
Only 50
Hanover Phist | 09/03/04
|
Traces or Packages
gsbtech | 09/03/04
|
|
Beware of FREE stuff..
Suicida| | 09/03/04
|
|
What Windows programmers need to learn...
Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
|
|
My message to developers
gsbtech | 09/03/04
|
|
Well said...
KOS-MOS | 09/03/04
|
Agreed
jdd48 | 09/03/04
|
|
One thing to remember
rapson | 09/03/04
|
|
And actually...
Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
|
|
Sheesh
rapson | 09/03/04
|
|
Not enough
nomorems | 09/03/04
|
|
Re: Not enough
Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
|
|
Mono *is* .NET
balsover | 09/03/04
|
|
Deja vu all over again
Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/03/04
|
|
Simple Solution
alterego_z | 09/03/04
|
|
That won't matter
Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
|
|
that depends on who exactly...
ryusen | 09/03/04
|
|
Umm.. true
Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
|
|
hmm great idea, but
ryusen | 09/03/04
|
|
Yay!!! Alarmed and Confused people don't need ActiveX.
boomslang_z | 09/03/04
|
|
Then surfing the web equates to walking a minefield.
Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/03/04
|
|
You're too late, did it already for anyone who will listen...
boomslang_z | 09/03/04
|
|
100% agree...
Jomo_z | 09/03/04
|
|
ActiveX Issues
gas_z | 09/03/04
|
|
Trusted Site Management and Internet Explorer...
boomslang_z | 09/03/04
|
|
on web pages...
ryusen | 09/03/04
|
|
These Are ALL Lights
ParadigmOdyssey | 09/03/04
|
|
So there saying ActiveX is like a modern corrupt CEO of a company?
Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/03/04
|
|
Seems like the vast majority of issues...
Qbt | 09/03/04
|
|
Likewise on three machines and no problems
BXLE | 09/03/04
|
|
Yes but,
Cardinal_Bill | 09/03/04
|
|
3rd-party applications/plugins, etc
BXLE | 09/03/04
|
|
Not to mention
nomorems | 09/03/04
|
|
Where Microsoft *could/should* have made it easier!
No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/03/04
|
|
Great Idea No Ax
BXLE | 09/03/04
|
|
No Way
nomorems | 09/03/04
|
|
Excellent idea
Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
|
|
yes but...
ryusen | 09/03/04
|
|
You make a good point..
d_jedi | 09/03/04
|
|
Yes, but MS strategy is to impede competitors...
Plain Logic | 09/04/04
|
|
ms only bundles if they have a competing product
V Sanders | 09/04/04
|
|
Is it just a Service Pack Fix ?
rreeder | 09/03/04
|
|
Simple Solution......
GregSalts | 09/03/04
|
|
multiple points:
ryusen | 09/03/04
|
|
ActiveX can go away, for all I care
CobraA1 | 09/03/04
|
|
active-X and inactive-B(rain)
michael-t | 09/03/04
|
|
why mess with IT
pj-xmesh | 09/04/04
|
|
active X is dead
V Sanders | 09/04/04
|
|
I prefer .net Framework over ActiveX...
Grayson_Peddie | 09/05/04
|
|
They're just plugins
CobraA1 | 09/05/04
|
|
That are being installed as ActiveX modules...
boomslang_z | 09/05/04
|
|
And that's not the worst of it.
Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
|
|
"Full" Windows programs?
Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
|
|
re: "Full" Windows programs?
CobraA1 | 09/06/04
|
|
You don't get it.
Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
|
|
what??
rbochan | 09/06/04
|
|
Which "security experts"?
Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/06/04
|
|
you paid them once, pay them again
educateme@... | 09/06/04
|
|
GOOD! ActiveX NEEDS to go away
BitTwiddler | 09/07/04
|
|
WOOT... Finally some control of poorly written and mailicious code
p_korman | 09/07/04
|
|
I Installed SP2 Over The Weekend
itanalyst | 09/07/04
|
|
Has anyone thought of security using VMware or something like it?
admin12345@... | 09/07/04
|
Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost-effective solutions to real-life IT problems.
