On The Insider: Backseat Confessions with Levi Johnston
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 27 of 63:
Next »
« Previous
on web pages...
many things that can be done with activeX can be done more securely with Java... and will reach a few more customer too.

not to mention, most conventional web design philosophy will tell you that all the flash might get people to see you site, but won't necessarily get them to stay and look at your site. i've seen too many sites that were fully of flashy elements, but really lacking on content or content was hard to find...
Posted by: ryusen   Posted on: 09/03/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

nuturing ActiveX is necessary for MS  gsbtech | 09/03/04
Only 50  Hanover Phist | 09/03/04
Traces or Packages  gsbtech | 09/03/04
Beware of FREE stuff..  Suicida| | 09/03/04
What Windows programmers need to learn...  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
My message to developers  gsbtech | 09/03/04
Well said...  KOS-MOS | 09/03/04
Agreed  jdd48 | 09/03/04
One thing to remember  rapson | 09/03/04
And actually...  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
Sheesh  rapson | 09/03/04
Not enough  nomorems | 09/03/04
Re: Not enough  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
Mono *is* .NET  balsover | 09/03/04
Deja vu all over again  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/03/04
Simple Solution  alterego_z | 09/03/04
That won't matter  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
that depends on who exactly...  ryusen | 09/03/04
Umm.. true  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
hmm great idea, but  ryusen | 09/03/04
Yay!!! Alarmed and Confused people don't need ActiveX.  boomslang_z | 09/03/04
Then surfing the web equates to walking a minefield.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/03/04
You're too late, did it already for anyone who will listen...  boomslang_z | 09/03/04
100% agree...  Jomo_z | 09/03/04
ActiveX Issues  gas_z | 09/03/04
Trusted Site Management and Internet Explorer...  boomslang_z | 09/03/04
on web pages...  ryusen | 09/03/04
These Are ALL Lights  ParadigmOdyssey | 09/03/04
So there saying ActiveX is like a modern corrupt CEO of a company?  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/03/04
Seems like the vast majority of issues...  Qbt | 09/03/04
Likewise on three machines and no problems  BXLE | 09/03/04
Yes but,  Cardinal_Bill | 09/03/04
3rd-party applications/plugins, etc  BXLE | 09/03/04
Not to mention  nomorems | 09/03/04
Where Microsoft *could/should* have made it easier!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/03/04
Great Idea No Ax  BXLE | 09/03/04
No Way  nomorems | 09/03/04
Excellent idea  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
yes but...  ryusen | 09/03/04
You make a good point..  d_jedi | 09/03/04
Yes, but MS strategy is to impede competitors...  Plain Logic | 09/04/04
ms only bundles if they have a competing product  V Sanders | 09/04/04
Is it just a Service Pack Fix ?  rreeder | 09/03/04
Simple Solution......  GregSalts | 09/03/04
multiple points:  ryusen | 09/03/04
ActiveX can go away, for all I care  CobraA1 | 09/03/04
active-X and inactive-B(rain)  michael-t | 09/03/04
why mess with IT  pj-xmesh | 09/04/04
active X is dead  V Sanders | 09/04/04
I prefer .net Framework over ActiveX...  Grayson_Peddie | 09/05/04
They're just plugins  CobraA1 | 09/05/04
That are being installed as ActiveX modules...  boomslang_z | 09/05/04
And that's not the worst of it.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
"Full" Windows programs?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
re: "Full" Windows programs?  CobraA1 | 09/06/04
You don't get it.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
what??  rbochan | 09/06/04
Which "security experts"?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/06/04
you paid them once, pay them again  educateme@... | 09/06/04
GOOD! ActiveX NEEDS to go away  BitTwiddler | 09/07/04
WOOT... Finally some control of poorly written and mailicious code  p_korman | 09/07/04
I Installed SP2 Over The Weekend  itanalyst | 09/07/04
Has anyone thought of security using VMware or something like it?  admin12345@... | 09/07/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here