On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 28 of 63:
Next »
« Previous
These Are ALL Lights
that every desktop computer deals with. RealPlayer,Quicktime,Flash,VRML . Most sites hosting these have the choice to use them, within their own assecory of corrospondence so that frequently the client in person knows what they are to expect .

Being that the invariable HTML,XML, along with the scripts,programming that comes with them sent over the net is all that we have with the choice of again only a handful of browsers - it would be to the best interest of the person at the machine to know about them.

A lot of questions concerning the ubiquitous 'experience of wich is 'applicable to the web user considers 'compatibility. But this is being taken over via the adjacent 'security,as to mean 'security first,compatibility later. And its a long way to actual knowledge of a choice,since the 'accomadation of the web browser technology requires the participation from more than only a 'client. That information is still a ways off,if not in terminology,in structural reference.

More emphasis can be put onto recognizing 'autoconnectivity for example. The necesity of security could be overridden,by simply stating 'autoconnective 'off. The hidden agenda here is the utilization of program 'ports,and 'client side IP address (the front end), for back-end ' reference. This most of whats seen from todays accesory of a firewall.

Dangerous to the computer,has to do with the simplicity of programing via communicative signal on an internet connected machine. But that programing has a purpose,wether it is being sent or received. Again though the ubiquity is overriden via the complexity of terminology,held within the everyday interaction for controling the browser. What ever task for that agenda,however mundane to the computer, is hidden from the reference of the person at the computer.

Its not all that front forward.Doesn't make them any less important.

-just talking.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 09/03/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

nuturing ActiveX is necessary for MS  gsbtech | 09/03/04
Only 50  Hanover Phist | 09/03/04
Traces or Packages  gsbtech | 09/03/04
Beware of FREE stuff..  Suicida| | 09/03/04
What Windows programmers need to learn...  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
My message to developers  gsbtech | 09/03/04
Well said...  KOS-MOS | 09/03/04
Agreed  jdd48 | 09/03/04
One thing to remember  rapson | 09/03/04
And actually...  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
Sheesh  rapson | 09/03/04
Not enough  nomorems | 09/03/04
Re: Not enough  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
Mono *is* .NET  balsover | 09/03/04
Deja vu all over again  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/03/04
Simple Solution  alterego_z | 09/03/04
That won't matter  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
that depends on who exactly...  ryusen | 09/03/04
Umm.. true  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
hmm great idea, but  ryusen | 09/03/04
Yay!!! Alarmed and Confused people don't need ActiveX.  boomslang_z | 09/03/04
Then surfing the web equates to walking a minefield.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/03/04
You're too late, did it already for anyone who will listen...  boomslang_z | 09/03/04
100% agree...  Jomo_z | 09/03/04
ActiveX Issues  gas_z | 09/03/04
Trusted Site Management and Internet Explorer...  boomslang_z | 09/03/04
on web pages...  ryusen | 09/03/04
These Are ALL Lights  ParadigmOdyssey | 09/03/04
So there saying ActiveX is like a modern corrupt CEO of a company?  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/03/04
Seems like the vast majority of issues...  Qbt | 09/03/04
Likewise on three machines and no problems  BXLE | 09/03/04
Yes but,  Cardinal_Bill | 09/03/04
3rd-party applications/plugins, etc  BXLE | 09/03/04
Not to mention  nomorems | 09/03/04
Where Microsoft *could/should* have made it easier!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/03/04
Great Idea No Ax  BXLE | 09/03/04
No Way  nomorems | 09/03/04
Excellent idea  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
yes but...  ryusen | 09/03/04
You make a good point..  d_jedi | 09/03/04
Yes, but MS strategy is to impede competitors...  Plain Logic | 09/04/04
ms only bundles if they have a competing product  V Sanders | 09/04/04
Is it just a Service Pack Fix ?  rreeder | 09/03/04
Simple Solution......  GregSalts | 09/03/04
multiple points:  ryusen | 09/03/04
ActiveX can go away, for all I care  CobraA1 | 09/03/04
active-X and inactive-B(rain)  michael-t | 09/03/04
why mess with IT  pj-xmesh | 09/04/04
active X is dead  V Sanders | 09/04/04
I prefer .net Framework over ActiveX...  Grayson_Peddie | 09/05/04
They're just plugins  CobraA1 | 09/05/04
That are being installed as ActiveX modules...  boomslang_z | 09/05/04
And that's not the worst of it.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
"Full" Windows programs?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
re: "Full" Windows programs?  CobraA1 | 09/06/04
You don't get it.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
what??  rbochan | 09/06/04
Which "security experts"?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/06/04
you paid them once, pay them again  educateme@... | 09/06/04
GOOD! ActiveX NEEDS to go away  BitTwiddler | 09/07/04
WOOT... Finally some control of poorly written and mailicious code  p_korman | 09/07/04
I Installed SP2 Over The Weekend  itanalyst | 09/07/04
Has anyone thought of security using VMware or something like it?  admin12345@... | 09/07/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline