On mySimon: Where The Wild Things Are Plush
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 25 of 63:
Next »
« Previous
ActiveX Issues
Here's my experience with ActiveX on WinXP SP1. After getting infected with IE toolbar malware, I set IE Internet security zone to 'High', which disabled all ActiveX, and took some other proactive measures on my PC as well. For the few regular sites that I used which required ActiveX, I manually added them to the IE white list. When I was in the market for a new vehicle, I went to some of the major manufacturers' sites (which I trust) and since they almost all use some sort of ActiveX-based function (like Flash), I had to manually add them to IE's white list and refresh the page to get them to display. This was a major hassle.

Here are some of the issues that I see with ActiveX:

1) Most users either don't know about or don't want to have the hassle of whitelisting all their websites.
2) Competition forces the vehicle manufacturer website designers to use some sort of ActiveX-based function in order to spice up their sites, even though they surely know that ActiveX in general is, let's face it, dangerous.
3) If someone is in desperate need of some information that is only contained on a site that uses some sort of ActiveX-based function, they will usually whitelist that site, even if it is unknown to them, and take the risk of getting an IE infection from it.

My ultimate solution to the whole mess was to just start using an alternate browser, which I am VERY happy with, since among other things I do not have to do any whitelisting (except for cookies). For most people, though, SP2 will be their only known solution to the ActiveX problem. Time will tell if it is both a satisfactory user experience AND reduces malware; a tough balancing act it seems.
Posted by: gas_z   Posted on: 09/03/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

nuturing ActiveX is necessary for MS  gsbtech | 09/03/04
Only 50  Hanover Phist | 09/03/04
Traces or Packages  gsbtech | 09/03/04
Beware of FREE stuff..  Suicida| | 09/03/04
What Windows programmers need to learn...  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
My message to developers  gsbtech | 09/03/04
Well said...  KOS-MOS | 09/03/04
Agreed  jdd48 | 09/03/04
One thing to remember  rapson | 09/03/04
And actually...  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
Sheesh  rapson | 09/03/04
Not enough  nomorems | 09/03/04
Re: Not enough  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
Mono *is* .NET  balsover | 09/03/04
Deja vu all over again  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/03/04
Simple Solution  alterego_z | 09/03/04
That won't matter  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
that depends on who exactly...  ryusen | 09/03/04
Umm.. true  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
hmm great idea, but  ryusen | 09/03/04
Yay!!! Alarmed and Confused people don't need ActiveX.  boomslang_z | 09/03/04
Then surfing the web equates to walking a minefield.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/03/04
You're too late, did it already for anyone who will listen...  boomslang_z | 09/03/04
100% agree...  Jomo_z | 09/03/04
ActiveX Issues  gas_z | 09/03/04
Trusted Site Management and Internet Explorer...  boomslang_z | 09/03/04
on web pages...  ryusen | 09/03/04
These Are ALL Lights  ParadigmOdyssey | 09/03/04
So there saying ActiveX is like a modern corrupt CEO of a company?  Xunil_Sierutuf | 09/03/04
Seems like the vast majority of issues...  Qbt | 09/03/04
Likewise on three machines and no problems  BXLE | 09/03/04
Yes but,  Cardinal_Bill | 09/03/04
3rd-party applications/plugins, etc  BXLE | 09/03/04
Not to mention  nomorems | 09/03/04
Where Microsoft *could/should* have made it easier!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 09/03/04
Great Idea No Ax  BXLE | 09/03/04
No Way  nomorems | 09/03/04
Excellent idea  Michael Kelly | 09/03/04
yes but...  ryusen | 09/03/04
You make a good point..  d_jedi | 09/03/04
Yes, but MS strategy is to impede competitors...  Plain Logic | 09/04/04
ms only bundles if they have a competing product  V Sanders | 09/04/04
Is it just a Service Pack Fix ?  rreeder | 09/03/04
Simple Solution......  GregSalts | 09/03/04
multiple points:  ryusen | 09/03/04
ActiveX can go away, for all I care  CobraA1 | 09/03/04
active-X and inactive-B(rain)  michael-t | 09/03/04
why mess with IT  pj-xmesh | 09/04/04
active X is dead  V Sanders | 09/04/04
I prefer .net Framework over ActiveX...  Grayson_Peddie | 09/05/04
They're just plugins  CobraA1 | 09/05/04
That are being installed as ActiveX modules...  boomslang_z | 09/05/04
And that's not the worst of it.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
"Full" Windows programs?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
re: "Full" Windows programs?  CobraA1 | 09/06/04
You don't get it.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/05/04
what??  rbochan | 09/06/04
Which "security experts"?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 09/06/04
you paid them once, pay them again  educateme@... | 09/06/04
GOOD! ActiveX NEEDS to go away  BitTwiddler | 09/07/04
WOOT... Finally some control of poorly written and mailicious code  p_korman | 09/07/04
I Installed SP2 Over The Weekend  itanalyst | 09/07/04
Has anyone thought of security using VMware or something like it?  admin12345@... | 09/07/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement