On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 7 of 20:
Next »
« Previous
Perceptual Eqaulity In All Devices With Copyright
Right now,the deviation from proprietary 'liscence,and 'person coins most of the relavent qualifications for 'processed computing. Yes - the control of the process . In the past a device was simply real physics everybody understood . Not that digital technology isn't real physics - but the business process derails the advantage due participants by deciding that advantage. Mainly by impersinating the persons who are benifactors of the technology and directly in a convenience the technologies provide already within them and whole.

For the copyright office,in the contrast,supposing that 'no copyright could utilize a digital device unless a specification was laid out detailing its role to the 'digital concept. That is within the digital concept is 'copyfriendly''. It without a doubt is the creative aspect AND mechanical advantage that adjoins INFORMATION,THAT IS COMMUNICATION.

Without a specification,covering what is available to authors - in refrain of 'liscence,the Copyright Office is actually in defacto .. NON-Performance. Becuase, the functionality is actually a benifactor of Copyright law proper. Non-inclusive of 'contract in lieu of 'copyright. Without specification the 'effects afforded 'digital copyrighted works for/from an author for mere fact of 'manufacture without cost - cannot be redeemed.

As well the reality of 'effects,deemed from authors continue to be devalued in the benificiery of the asset of them,from consumers who purchase them. Simply on basis of 'contract in lieu wich via the 'convenience of the 'technology,is being usurped to both authors,and consumers.

It should be a 'new day away from the labels.DMCA does not change this. A 'copyfriendly specification can include 'copyright proper,if it was utilized correctly. With 'effect chosen to be 'released'' of an author proper detailing what is same perceptual advantage they know of its performance,as that a consumer can choose from.

For 'communications,the reality of it means that consumers should have the 'perceptual equality' in the aspect of using the technology. What this will do,is simply vindicate a bunch of ill placed premises,while vacating that relationship in technology. Within communications individuals require Perceptual Equality with 'copyrighted business practices within technologies of a digital nature.

As for the Copyright office,copyright proper,requires addressing the reality of copyright in and of law itself for the keepsake of author in digital relationship. Since there is more to the royalty,than wich manufacturer can produce consumers to pay money for them.

We have that right to Perceptual Equality,so that the same relationship known of performance,is that wich is known in the 'effect of the copyrights author. But first the copyrights must have specification with an adjucent 'copyfriendly denotation,because that is what we are paying for.

We are not juxaposed to be referenced as non-persons in the aspect of 'effects in copyrighted works from the value in asset of them.Just as they are different from the 'copyright proper,in and of law the admonision of authors to it.

If copyright law wishes to participate,then it requires a specification equal to our perception of it. Since copyright is for everybody,although it does not perform in realistic terms w/o first alienating its own person in author from the abstract of it. As well as consumers wishing the well being of the 'asset in 'effects from copyrighted works.

Copyright law is in non-performance. Since the benificieries of 'royalties are the only considerations of premise. An authors aspect in right to control 'effects,in distribution, are as much in juxaposition,as the 'contract in lieu delagation is bound by erroneous intention within the technologies themselves.

Guess what sometimes a statement is only true. The FCC getting communications from 'information ""?

Perceptual Equality.


- just talking.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 09/02/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Good grief!  KOS-MOS | 09/02/04
Fox in the henhouse  AbsolutelyNot | 09/02/04
America has an election soon..  d_jedi | 09/02/04
Vote early and often be the first on your block to the polls  Squawkbox | 09/02/04
Well, then..  d_jedi | 09/02/04
Most voters are idiots  Squawkbox | 09/03/04
Perceptual Eqaulity In All Devices With Copyright  ParadigmOdyssey | 09/02/04
If you steal you go to jail !  realitycheck101 | 09/02/04
And when...  KOS-MOS | 09/02/04
Shut up!  AriB_z | 09/02/04
Take your hands off the keyboard and stepback  Squawkbox | 09/02/04
Stealing is wrong, but what if you're trading open source and such.  el1jones | 09/03/04
PBKAC  AbsolutelyNot | 09/03/04
here's what i can support:  ryusen | 09/02/04
I agree  AriB_z | 09/02/04
This is getting ridiculous.  Tim Patterson | 09/02/04
They will never stop braying about file sharing  mreilly19 | 09/03/04
The big difference  none none | 09/05/04
Emule isn't very commercial  GreatInca | 11/23/04
Building Your Own P2P World!  aimini | 06/02/05

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More