On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 12 of 29:
Next »
« Previous
Irretrievable
Yes, this one's defeat is a worthwhile result, even at such great expense.

Still, following this case, three conclusions become unavoidable:
1. Patents are issued after less than thorough examination,
2. Invalid patents can restrict a field because of the time needed to overcome a bad patent, and
3. Because of the expense, only wealthy organizations (and maybe pro bono outfits) can afford the expense of defending or attacking a patent.

Patents have become weapons for commercial competition, and not a way to assure individuals and small companies (as well as large organizations) that they can profit from their ideas, without having them stolen.
Okay, maybe this has been true for a long while, but this case does concentrate the attention.

So, large companies will be defending the current system. Fast and thorough patent reviews/appeals would cost the Federal government money they don't want to pay. And to do the reviews/appeals well, maybe we'd have to attract Albert Einstein back into patent work.

So, I'm saying that, for me at least, the most significant result of this case is the realization that the patent system is damaging and will not be fixed. Microsoft could afford the $500 million a lot easier than the US can afford a patent system hostile to the system's professed intent, but that's what we'll have.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 08/19/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Good news for EVERYONE!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/18/04
not everyone...  ryusen | 08/18/04
Yup, greed is a killer.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/18/04
yep  V Sanders | 08/18/04
Soft, he put soft at the end  FilledOut | 08/19/04
Yup, just like Coke, Chevy, and Ge had to do.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/19/04
Agreed  Patrick Jones | 08/19/04
definately  johnnyu | 08/19/04
Yup  CobraA1 | 08/19/04
No, it isn't.  Anton Philidor | 08/19/04
Won't argue that the patent process needs to be overhauled.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/19/04
Irretrievable  Anton Philidor | 08/19/04
Perhaps patent law should be a bit more like trademark law?  toadlife | 08/18/04
I agree on that one..  d_jedi | 08/19/04
Not really  IT_User | 08/19/04
OMG!  chiwawa | 08/19/04
ROTFLMAO (NT)  Patrick Jones | 08/19/04
No surprise because Bush is Microsoft's dog.  systemcleaner | 08/19/04
Que?  KTLA | 08/19/04
Why do I bother responding to these trolls?  d_jedi | 08/19/04
You know, ah to heck with it, not worth the effort.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/19/04
No he's not....  UncleBubba | 08/19/04
Sorry guys, I can't help myself  rapson | 08/19/04
Did you read word by word what I wrote?  systemcleaner | 08/19/04
Your ignorance amuses me.  d_jedi | 08/19/04
Not surprising, since W3 org stepped in and prior art  FilledOut | 08/19/04
Looks like ZDNet took the day off.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/19/04
?  rapson | 08/19/04
Apparently slow news day....... (NT)  GregSalts | 08/19/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More