On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 9 of 55:
Next »
« Previous
Difficult times ahead for Linux...
I say this not because of SCO's case, although I have seen the evidence and it is truly overwhelming. No, I say this because all of the feasibility studies I have commissioned have returned overwhelming data supporting the fact that Linux is not as robust as Windows Server 2003 for mission critical applications. Take for example the theory of Diminishing Returns. My research has proven that the more one invests in Linux, the more likely the company is to be financially ruined. I have proven this time and time again by watching friends of mine attempt to deploy Linux and laugh as they fail because their MCSE's are not able to handle such a lame OS. It is inevitable.
Posted by: Mike Cox   Posted on: 08/16/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Call a priest...  Fred Fredrickson | 08/16/04
Your hero today...  balsover | 08/17/04
We already have one...  techboy_z | 08/17/04
Go IBM, Go !!! . . . . . . . . To SCO: "Hasta la vista, baby"  Plain Logic | 08/16/04
Hey, Don!  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/16/04
Imagine that, your wrong again.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/17/04
So is it true?  Laff | 08/17/04
Many seem to think so....  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/17/04
Difficult times ahead for Linux...  Mike Cox | 08/16/04
Good one  swoopee | 08/16/04
I can't believe it!  spammyman | 08/16/04
There is one true OS  techboy_z | 08/17/04
Thanks for the laugh!  luke_sg | 08/16/04
Upgrade  in-DUH-vidual | 08/17/04
Yeah, OK  intellectualproperty | 08/17/04
Mike's Linux Theory  Yehuda Mann | 08/17/04
That is funny...  MG_z | 08/17/04
WOOOOSH!!!!!  James T. Kirk | 08/17/04
Absolutely correct!. Give that man a cigar!  bhanes@... | 08/17/04
Linux not the problem...  ECLS | 08/17/04
Cox....You're a scream  shawkins | 08/17/04
That could not have been a serious post.  balsover | 08/17/04
I suppose that your MSCE's can handle...  The King's Servant | 08/17/04
If you've seen overwhelming evidence ...  mlybbert | 08/17/04
SCO..Sorry Chapter 11 re-Organization  Laff | 08/17/04
Interesting from a couple of points.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/17/04
2.5  sa_z | 08/17/04
Aren't they saying something to the effect that  Laff | 08/17/04
No disagreement from me.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/17/04
Related issue, yes, already in court  mlybbert | 08/17/04
Not he said/she said.....They (AT&T) said.  aladorn@... | 08/17/04
Yes, Mr. Wilson is part of the "he said".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/17/04
That's true but....  AmusedAtItAll | 09/02/04
When they drop it, can we take a picture?  Xunil_Sierutuf | 08/17/04
Or yours?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/17/04
No one argues they didn't do it....  doe_z | 08/17/04
I beleive that the court will drop the case  balsover | 08/17/04
You mean like Sun, IBM, Oracle, Sony, Apple, etc...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/17/04
Well to be fair...those others you listed do try  Laff | 08/17/04
You mean like Apple suing Real?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/17/04
Has Apple sued REAL or only threatened to?  Laff | 08/17/04
Is that happening?  voska | 08/17/04
Not even vaguely  IT_User | 08/17/04
No, more like MS  tic swayback | 08/17/04
Agree: "when a company needs to use attorneys ..."  mlybbert | 08/17/04
Gross misstatement with a dash of truth...  John Le'Brecage | 08/17/04
John, you misunderstand.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/18/04
Response about those couple of points  mlybbert | 08/17/04
Agreement not intended for homegrown code  dwjohnso | 08/17/04
IBM strikes at SCO claims  farson@... | 08/17/04
A lesson to be learned...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/17/04
Only SCO argues....  doe_z | 08/17/04
Partial agreement  mlybbert | 08/17/04
*Finally* ZDnet admits SCO is "faltering"  CobraA1 | 08/18/04
SCO leave IBM alone  FilledOut | 08/18/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here