On The Insider: Adrian Brody to Star in New 'Predator'
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 9 of 77:
Next »
« Previous
Minor Correction.
If Linux belongs to SCO...

SCO never said Linux belongs to them. There is much in Linux that belongs to BSD, AT&T Unix (Sys-X), and a whole lot of contributors from around the world. Stuff that is legally allowed to be in there. SCO can't claim ownership of such work as it is owned and created by others.

What they actually said has had so many inconsistencies and versions depending on parties involved, that it is difficult to figure out what their current stance is on each front. They basically seem to say that IBM illegally put SysV code into Linux, but have yet to provide even a hint of such action (after a year!). Thus, all Linux users are using SysV code w/o permission and must pay up for past and future usage. Keep in mind we don't know if they are still saying that or some skewed version of it.

Their excuse seems to be that they are in discovery to find such infringement and that they are being delayed by IBM as it hasn't turned over all the code and developers that SCO would like (the court didn't grant them access as it felt it wasn't needed).

But all of IBM's contributions are public and freely available for viewing, and SCO already has SysV code. So they have had all the relevant work to find such infringement from the beginning, and should have checked the code before filing a lawsuit like they told all of us that they did.

Other than the screaming and chest beating, there seems to be nothing that supports SCO even having a case against IBM.
Posted by: doe_z   Posted on: 08/10/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SCO's claims...  sbj | 08/10/04
Hey, that list is too short  Chad_z | 08/10/04
I wonder if SCO realizes  Letophoro | 08/10/04
I don't think it is 283 anymore since IBM states  Laff | 08/10/04
Change of heart  Bill4 | 08/10/04
Ah but then IBM is not going after Linux but SCO  Laff | 08/10/04
But  johnnyu | 08/10/04
So true...  msdead | 08/11/04
Minor Correction.  doe_z | 08/10/04
Oops...  doe_z | 08/10/04
Minor Correction II  TlCl | 08/11/04
Spin cycle set to HIGH today..hee hee hee  Laff | 08/11/04
TICI....you're a DOLL:)  Laff | 08/11/04
Thanks for the compliment  TlCl | 08/11/04
Major Correction I  The King's Servant | 08/12/04
One problem  msdead | 08/11/04
They would  johnnyu | 08/11/04
How much is 3 X 0?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/10/04
I don't care what anyone says...You ARE funny:)  Laff | 08/10/04
He has his moments...  crocd | 08/10/04
He's even actually right once in a while...  WhoIsDaMan | 08/10/04
To give him his due,  Yagotta B. Kidding | 08/10/04
No one is buying them so price is no issue  rgriffith64@... | 08/10/04
Risks  Solid Water | 08/10/04
Cooking the books  rgriffith64@... | 08/10/04
All along?  KTLA | 08/10/04
SCOsource parody  crocd | 08/10/04
Where is the verification that SCO is paying Novell royalties?  TlCl | 08/11/04
But Novell does not agree that SCO owns what they  Laff | 08/11/04
Excuse me?  TlCl | 08/11/04
It was assertained...  The King's Servant | 08/12/04
Nice summation  AmusedAtItAll | 09/02/04
they own the right to licensing it  aladorn@... | 08/11/04
Ok -- where did you get your figures?  TlCl | 08/11/04
Do a little research yourself  drew32 | 08/11/04
Some kind of joker?  AmusedAtItAll | 09/02/04
I'm speechless.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 08/10/04
Darl mcBride to be crowned worlds greatest gambler  Squawkbox | 08/10/04
Didn't they do this once already?  rpmyers1 | 08/10/04
I'll be glad to buy a license...  msalomon | 08/10/04
If the claims were not supportable, how did the suit get this far?  TlCl | 08/11/04
Man you do like to stretch don't you.....:)  Laff | 08/11/04
Granted  TlCl | 08/11/04
I think what we are all waiting for...  AmusedAtItAll | 09/02/04
Facts, not allegations!  The King's Servant | 08/12/04
Best buy your license now  tic swayback | 08/10/04
We should buy them...frame them and in a few  Laff | 08/10/04
Toilet paper is worth more...  Xunil_Sierutuf | 08/10/04
This company is Hilarious...  BitTwiddler | 08/10/04
SCO is dead ...so hurry up and lie down already  nograin | 08/10/04
Evil  dwest_z | 08/10/04
How many zeroes...  vferrara | 08/10/04
They dropped their IP claims in the lawsuit.  Arrg | 08/10/04
What?  TlCl | 08/11/04
Besides claims what EVIDENCE has SCO shown?  Laff | 08/11/04
Pardon--What phase is the case in?  TlCl | 08/11/04
Do you understand the issues?  The King's Servant | 08/12/04
The next SCO headline will be...  gordon@... | 08/10/04
I think ms is the only one to pay for a license so far  V Sanders | 08/10/04
MS...  nomorems | 08/10/04
... and Sun  TlCl | 08/11/04
Both MS and SUN in one form or another are  Laff | 08/11/04
As are IBM, RedHat, Mandrake, Xandros, etc.  TlCl | 08/11/04
V. I think you just HIT on the plan here!!!  Laff | 08/11/04
On this point, consider that increased license  TlCl | 08/11/04
Blah Blah SCO  nomorems | 08/10/04
Funny that..  Fred Fredrickson | 08/10/04
examine what a license means  TlCl | 08/11/04
Yeah, and that is going to happen in what Bizzaro  Laff | 08/11/04
lol  johnnyu | 08/11/04
Go ahead SCO  msdead | 08/11/04
This reminds me of credit card companies  mlybbert | 08/11/04
SCO:The Movie starring Mel Brooks as Darl McBride  drichards1953 | 08/12/04
Not in this universe  TlCl | 08/13/04
Hey TSG, please sue me!  Rick S._z | 08/12/04
BTW, I AM a business user  Rick S._z | 08/12/04
don't even own scosource.com  sco_source_scam | 10/07/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here