Red Hat to serve Java

TalkBack 2 of 6:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

It depends on your definition of "win"

If your definition of "win" is quantity, then MS might win, but don't forget Apache, which is dominating in the quantity area. If your definition of "win" is revenue, again maybe; being at the low end, it would take enough quantity to get the revenue. Now if your definition of "win" is half-a$$, MS wins hands down. There will always be enterprises who will pay for a more secure solution than the ones provided by MS. Before you say that all software is insecure, you name one vendor's server software who has been compromised as much (quantity) or cost their customers as much (revenue) in the past 5 to 10 years.

Posted by: Taz_z   Posted on: 07/29/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now
• Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now
• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Infrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now