On TechRepublic: Linux desktops have tanked: Get over it
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 46 of 54:
Next »
« Previous
Since most posters here won't use it anyway
kinda nice to see that there still is posting on.
Posted by: FilledOut   Posted on: 07/28/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Everybody calm down...  Mike Cox | 07/27/04
..Linux x86_64 has been available since last year..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/27/04
Small correction  michael-t | 07/27/04
I meant AMD64, but thanks for correction(NT)  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/28/04
Yawn!  AbsolutelyNot | 07/27/04
Are you implying W2K3 needs Itanium to run print/file servers?  Plain Logic | 07/27/04
Implied Itanium requirement -- was that 32 or 64 bits you have now???  clasher_z | 07/29/04
Snork!  Cardinal_Bill | 07/27/04
deploy 64 bit  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07
6.2 Mike you've done better  Squawkbox | 07/27/04
Itanium  georgep_z | 07/28/04
You are delaying too?  clasher_z | 07/28/04
Come again!?!?!  chiwawa | 07/27/04
Even if you go easy on them.  doe_z | 07/27/04
Love ZDNet's "related links"...  Fred Fredrickson | 07/27/04
Ain't it intersting  Squawkbox | 07/28/04
Proof positive...  bjbrock | 07/27/04
MS wouldn't know QUALITY if it hit them between the eyes !  realitycheck101 | 07/27/04
Of course, you know absolutely nothing about software development  marksashton | 07/28/04
Agreed  PA-ITGuy | 07/28/04
64-bit drivers...  prime21 | 07/28/04
either way...  ryusen | 07/28/04
64-bit software  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07
64-bit software  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07
While you are waiting for Wintel 64bit.  alterego_z | 07/27/04
REPENT, You Apple loving heathen.......  middle of nowhere | 07/27/04
correction for you  doh123 | 07/28/04
The chickens are coming home to roost  Sunny Jalolly | 07/27/04
Are you sure Mac OS X 10.3 is 64-bit?  dvm | 07/27/04
10.3 Not 64 Bit  MonsterPuppy | 07/28/04
well...  doh123 | 07/28/04
MUCH better than Panther  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07
Intel owes them one  TerryC_z | 07/28/04
New light...Intel & SCO?  techboy_z | 07/28/04
Isn't this a blow to Intel too?  Robert Crocker | 07/28/04
abandoning the Itanium route???  PA-ITGuy | 07/28/04
Then again  johnnyu | 07/28/04
How old is the IA-64 and don't forget VME/VSB  clasher_z | 07/28/04
IA-64 == Alpha, VME == Hypertransport, ??? WTF  TerryC_z | 07/29/04
Hey... we're both on the AMD side  clasher_z | 07/29/04
agree with you  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07
IA-64 == Alpha, VME == Hypertransport, ??? WTF  TerryC_z | 07/29/04
Itanium  clasher_z | 07/29/04
Correction / addendum  clasher_z | 07/29/04
Credit where credit is due  TerryC_z | 07/30/04
Since most posters here won't use it anyway  FilledOut | 07/28/04
there are a few  php_developer | 07/28/04
No biggie...  BitTwiddler | 07/28/04
Trustworthy computing?  d_jedi | 07/28/04
Win XP/2003 64 delay -- wonder why  clasher_z | 07/28/04
calm down?  lotta_anger | 07/29/04
What comes after XP from M$ --- Round 2 anyone?  clasher_z | 07/29/04
addendum  clasher_z | 07/29/04
you can't beat them  yu_forum@... | 05/25/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

SmartPlanet

Click Here