On GameFAQs: The top 10 strangest game bosses
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 13 of 16:
Next »
« Previous
re:oops
From White Box's site:
"We have several servers and over fifty workstations running Red Hat Linux and were left high and dry by their recent shift in business plan. Our choices were a difficult migration to another distribution or paying RedHat an annual fee greater than the amortized value of our hardware."

GNU allows for this and it undermines Red Hat's efforts to be a profitable company. I would be uncomfortable being employed by them.

You only supported my argument about free software.
Posted by: rkadowns   Posted on: 07/23/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Current AMD64 and pending Intel processors...  cjcoats | 07/22/04
No drawbacks for consumers of open source  Richard Flude | 07/22/04
Yup, and...  Fred Fredrickson | 07/23/04
5 months to go  seosamh_z | 07/23/04
Lost?  rkadowns | 07/23/04
Suse and Redhat Are Better Off The More Alike They Are  deet | 07/23/04
but  seosamh_z | 07/23/04
Customer service will be the difference.  Arrg | 07/23/04
How much..  seosamh_z | 07/23/04
Give me a break  Arrg | 07/23/04
Charges..  rkadowns | 07/23/04
Oops  Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/23/04
re:oops  rkadowns | 07/23/04
If your product requires less support, it costs you less to support it.  DonnieBoy | 07/23/04
Revenue: The other side of the equation  seosamh_z | 07/23/04
Tend to the Garden  Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/23/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here