On mySimon: Robert Rodriguez Studded-Band Skirt
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 4 of 28:
Next »
« Previous
here
"For one thing, why would "missile pods" (which, like all conspiracy photos are shown ultra-gainy - an easy way to cover up any doctoring of the photos!) be fitted if the buildings had carefully placed explosions for a controlled demolition?"

Because a plane crash could have NEVER taken down either tower. The designers specifically made it to withstand a direct aircraft hit. They were utterly SHOCKED when it came down. The extra pods were to make the explosion bigger than it would have been. If the planes crashed by themselves they would have made a much smaller explosion. And it would have been obvious to everyone that it never could have come down that way. The big explosion made it seem more real.

"Also, how the buildings would collapse would depend largely on how the building was built."

Well then answer me this: why did building 7 come down? It wasn't even hit by anything! It was a full block away from where the attack took place. Doesn't make any sense. Especially when you have Larry Silverstein, the owner of the WTC complex who put a hefty insurance policy on the lot just a few months before 9/11, admitting on a PBS documentary that he ordered the "pulling" (demolishing) of WTC 7 & 6. You can hear for yourself him giving the order to demolish the building here:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/011904wtc7.html

These explosives culd have ONLY been placed before September 11th. What were explosives doing being placed in these buildings? And why did the twin towers, towers 1 & 2, fall EXACTLY the same as WTC 7???

http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%20History/WTC7Fairytale.htm
Posted by: Jeff Spicoli   Posted on: 07/22/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

9/11 coverup  Jeff Spicoli | 07/22/04
Repukes will never admit it was intentional  itanalyst | 07/22/04
I'd like to know what you're smoking . . .  CobraA1 | 07/22/04
here  Jeff Spicoli | 07/22/04
Are you for real?  Fred Fredrickson | 07/23/04
Grow a brain..and then try talking  Jeff Spicoli | 07/23/04
Hmm . . .  CobraA1 | 07/23/04
Grow a brain..and then try talking  Jeff Spicoli | 07/23/04
more disagreement . . .  CobraA1 | 07/23/04
Actually  Linux User 147560 | 07/23/04
Addendum to my statement  Linux User 147560 | 07/23/04
More stuff to add . . .  CobraA1 | 07/23/04
US Government ALLOWED 9/11 To Happen  itanalyst | 07/22/04
Even worse: THEY did it themselves!  Jeff Spicoli | 07/22/04
Just because it's on the Internet doesn't mean it's true!  CobraA1 | 07/22/04
Reading report . . .  CobraA1 | 07/22/04
I never said NORAD wasn't "up"  Jeff Spicoli | 07/23/04
OK, whatever  CobraA1 | 07/23/04
More suspicious juiciness  Jeff Spicoli | 07/22/04
That last link didn't go there, try this one  Jeff Spicoli | 07/22/04
Flight Data recorder  middle_road | 07/22/04
even more  Jeff Spicoli | 07/22/04
Exactly.  Fred Fredrickson | 07/22/04
I don't agree with anything here however  rkadowns | 07/22/04
true  CobraA1 | 07/23/04
I watched Farenhigh 411  Harry Butts | 07/22/04
I watched Farenhigh 411  Harry Butts | 07/22/04
I watched Farenhigh 411  Harry Butts | 07/22/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here