Report on Sept. 11 finds home on Net

TalkBack 3 of 28:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

I'd like to know what you're smoking . . .

"Why was WTC buildings rigged with explosives on September 11th?"

Wonderful. A conspiracy theorist. You can make *anything* and post it on the Internet. Fake sounds, pictures, etc.

For one thing, why would "missile pods" (which, like all conspiracy photos are shown ultra-gainy - an easy way to cover up any doctoring of the photos!) be fitted if the buildings had carefully placed explosions for a controlled demolition? Like all conspiracy theories, the random facts simply don't make sense when put together.

Also, how the buildings would collapse would depend largely on how the building was built. In any case, all the "evidence" is too vague, and the sources questionable, to make any sort of judgement from them.

Sorry, I personally am not fond of conspiracy theories. They just make people more afraid, even though they are likely not true. Unless somebody has some pretty hard evidence, they're not worth pursuing.

Posted by: CobraA1   Posted on: 07/22/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now
• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Iinfrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now
• Get top-ranked Novell support for Red Hat when you switch Novell If Linux is going to power your mission-critical applications, you'd ... Download Now