On mySimon: French Sole Season Leather Flats
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 15 of 24:
Next »
« Previous
Constitutional problem...
The Betamax case was alarming enough, considering that it was made by a slim majority.

The major problem I see here goes well beyond copyrights and intellectual property. Presumption of innocence is the major Constitutional freedom that is threatened. Sony was, apparently, presumed guilty until "substantial non-infringing uses" could be proven. Even then, 4 of the judges believed this was insufficient. If something that can be used to infringe copyrights must be forbidden despite any number of non-infringing uses, then either copyright infringement is a special class of crime that must be prevented at all costs or there is effectively no defense against anyone who wishes to sue anyone who makes anything that could be used to harm them in any way.

Ordinarily, when one is accused of having committed a crime, he is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Now, however, one is presumptively guilty not only of a crime committed in the past, but of any number of crimes not yet committed. This is the "prior restraint" issue that constitutional law has identified as unacceptable.

Of course, presumption of innocence only applies in criminal cases, and Betamax was a civil case. Also, the burden of proof is still on the plaintiff, but the standard of proof is lower, and the proposed law effectively abolishes the burden-of-proof requirement. It doesn't even shift the burden of proof to the defendant, since the defendant has nothing to prove but a negative.
Posted by: bthomasmo@...   Posted on: 07/22/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Utterly Ridiculous  Jeff Spicoli | 07/21/04
Greedy people who don't get it  Seething Ganglia | 07/21/04
Dilute and induce  Anton Philidor | 07/21/04
You hit it!  AbsolutelyNot | 07/22/04
Interesting language  Anton Philidor | 07/22/04
Interesting Aspect  ParadigmOdyssey | 07/22/04
Litmus Test  alterego_z | 07/22/04
Who can get them re-elected?  bjornafreeman@... | 07/22/04
Would this affect BitTorrent as well?  worknman | 07/22/04
This will affect more than P2P  Seething Ganglia | 07/22/04
Government run amok  auratum@... | 07/22/04
Let's ban everything  tic swayback | 07/22/04
Maddness  voska | 07/22/04
Leave my CD burner out of this  BJMClarke | 07/22/04
Constitutional problem...  bthomasmo@... | 07/22/04
Capitalist dictatorship  virus00 | 07/22/04
And of course we all know...  Omch'Ar | 07/22/04
A question...  Not average Joe | 07/22/04
An answer...  AbsolutelyNot | 07/22/04
Like I've always said, PIRACY ROCKS!!!!!!!!!!  cybershoplifter | 07/22/04
RIAA Are liars, CD sales are not hurt by p2p  tic swayback | 07/22/04
Of course it's not the P2P that hurts! THIS hurts-  AbsolutelyNot | 07/22/04
Software authors hurt more by companies than downloaders  tic swayback | 07/22/04
Rising use of P2P distribution  Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/22/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More