On CBS MoneyWatch: Which Credit Cards are Best?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 13 of 52:
Next »
« Previous
Every one of your examples...
...are means of limiting the usability of OOXML. They aren't advantages, they're disadvantages. They're means of keeping people from accessing their own data.

If there really is any advantage to lifespan controls on documents, nothing says they can't be wrapped up in a time-aware encryption. If you don't want the data made available to an "unapproved PC," either encrypt it or make sure it doesn't get to that PC in the first place.

The one thing you don't need to do is burden millions of people with these fringe requirements.

Posted by: Henrik Moller   Posted on: 01/30/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Hmmmm  DemonX | 01/29/08
Funny, they could not even give one example of something in a legacy  DonnieBoy | 01/29/08
Why should they?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/08
Then why should we care what they say?  John L. Ries | 01/30/08
They should because it would help their case. If they don't, everything  DonnieBoy | 01/30/08
(NT) Put a fork in it already :o)  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/29/08
This is like the SCO case. MS doesn't want to give any examples, as they  DonnieBoy | 01/29/08
I know one! Their date leap year bug!  BanjoPaterson | 01/30/08
Man, if MS would have just told us that we need to propagate errors and bad  DonnieBoy | 01/30/08
Ok, as you are crying for it  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/08
Platinum Wheels  DannyO_0x98 | 01/30/08
Wow!  SpikeyMike | 01/30/08
Every one of your examples...  Henrik Moller | 01/30/08
And, you do NOT want a different solution for each document type.  DonnieBoy | 01/30/08
Duh! Easy....  techboy_z | 01/30/08
And how do you do that in legacy MS office?  nomoremicrosoft | 01/30/08
Those are things that should NOT be specific to only office documents, but  DonnieBoy | 01/30/08
So the only thing ODF lacks is DRM? (NT)  John L. Ries | 01/30/08
Good joke !  j.dupont | 01/29/08
Yes  roaming | 01/29/08
Message has been deleted.  jareipaja@... | 01/29/08
Seems the vast majority  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/08
Too many dolts  SpikeyMike | 01/30/08
ALL people are Stuck with MS because of MS's efforts.  nomoremicrosoft | 01/30/08
Microsoft and standards. They are not friends.  hkommedal | 01/30/08
Name one!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/08
I'll name them all  SpikeyMike | 01/30/08
Are you experiencing...  ego.sum.stig@... | 01/30/08
From a technicality stand point...  ju1ce | 01/30/08
Ack?  ego.sum.stig@... | 01/30/08
Even politicians ? ? Where ??  hkommedal | 01/30/08
A standard 1 inch is 25.4mm. Should it grow to 29mm ?  hkommedal | 01/30/08
Sure! MS INNOVATED the standard!  nomoremicrosoft | 01/30/08
MS didn't worry about compatibility for Office 03 SP3  Palmetto | 01/30/08
Sorry but you are wrong  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/08
No, he is correct.  SpikeyMike | 01/30/08
Various ways that MOST people  ju1ce | 01/30/08
Thanks Palmetto  Sheeva | 02/01/08
Anyone can create new OOXML docs. Only MS can read MS converted OOXML.  RichardBronosky | 01/30/08
RE: Microsoft makes last-gasp OOXML push  DannyO_0x98 | 01/30/08
Caught that too...  SpikeyMike | 01/30/08
M$ paid for OOXML support  Linux Geek | 01/30/08
Well, MS in its right to 'push'  Boot_Agnostic | 01/30/08
Faux logic...  techboy_z | 01/30/08
Can't convert into ODF  shoktai@... | 01/30/08
Google does not support OOXML  JeremyAllison | 01/30/08
Thanks JA! Nice clarification!  techboy_z | 01/30/08
lies, damned lies, and statistics.  Ole Man | 01/30/08
RE: Microsoft makes last-gasp OOXML push  bigpicture | 01/30/08
An ISO-standard is for everyone to use FREELY, without  hkommedal | 01/30/08
OOXML 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0  alokgovil | 01/30/08
Buy into what you want  Boot_Agnostic | 01/31/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc