On MovieTome: Pixar's new film has characters from Up
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 26 of 52:
Next »
« Previous
Name one!
Name one standard MS "broke". I agree they ADD TO existing standards to provide innovative solutions, but I have not seen them break a standard.

Isn't that what a standard is supposed to be? A STARTING point to build upon? Yes, I beleive so...
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 01/30/08 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Hmmmm  DemonX | 01/29/08
Funny, they could not even give one example of something in a legacy  DonnieBoy | 01/29/08
Why should they?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/08
Then why should we care what they say?  John L. Ries | 01/30/08
They should because it would help their case. If they don't, everything  DonnieBoy | 01/30/08
(NT) Put a fork in it already :o)  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/29/08
This is like the SCO case. MS doesn't want to give any examples, as they  DonnieBoy | 01/29/08
I know one! Their date leap year bug!  BanjoPaterson | 01/30/08
Man, if MS would have just told us that we need to propagate errors and bad  DonnieBoy | 01/30/08
Ok, as you are crying for it  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/08
Platinum Wheels  DannyO_0x98 | 01/30/08
Wow!  SpikeyMike | 01/30/08
Every one of your examples...  Henrik Moller | 01/30/08
And, you do NOT want a different solution for each document type.  DonnieBoy | 01/30/08
Duh! Easy....  techboy_z | 01/30/08
And how do you do that in legacy MS office?  nomoremicrosoft | 01/30/08
Those are things that should NOT be specific to only office documents, but  DonnieBoy | 01/30/08
So the only thing ODF lacks is DRM? (NT)  John L. Ries | 01/30/08
Good joke !  j.dupont | 01/29/08
Yes  roaming | 01/29/08
Message has been deleted.  jareipaja@... | 01/29/08
Seems the vast majority  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/08
Too many dolts  SpikeyMike | 01/30/08
ALL people are Stuck with MS because of MS's efforts.  nomoremicrosoft | 01/30/08
Microsoft and standards. They are not friends.  hkommedal | 01/30/08
Name one!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/08
I'll name them all  SpikeyMike | 01/30/08
Are you experiencing...  ego.sum.stig@... | 01/30/08
From a technicality stand point...  ju1ce | 01/30/08
Ack?  ego.sum.stig@... | 01/30/08
Even politicians ? ? Where ??  hkommedal | 01/30/08
A standard 1 inch is 25.4mm. Should it grow to 29mm ?  hkommedal | 01/30/08
Sure! MS INNOVATED the standard!  nomoremicrosoft | 01/30/08
MS didn't worry about compatibility for Office 03 SP3  Palmetto | 01/30/08
Sorry but you are wrong  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/30/08
No, he is correct.  SpikeyMike | 01/30/08
Various ways that MOST people  ju1ce | 01/30/08
Thanks Palmetto  Sheeva | 02/01/08
Anyone can create new OOXML docs. Only MS can read MS converted OOXML.  RichardBronosky | 01/30/08
RE: Microsoft makes last-gasp OOXML push  DannyO_0x98 | 01/30/08
Caught that too...  SpikeyMike | 01/30/08
M$ paid for OOXML support  Linux Geek | 01/30/08
Well, MS in its right to 'push'  Boot_Agnostic | 01/30/08
Faux logic...  techboy_z | 01/30/08
Can't convert into ODF  shoktai@... | 01/30/08
Google does not support OOXML  JeremyAllison | 01/30/08
Thanks JA! Nice clarification!  techboy_z | 01/30/08
lies, damned lies, and statistics.  Ole Man | 01/30/08
RE: Microsoft makes last-gasp OOXML push  bigpicture | 01/30/08
An ISO-standard is for everyone to use FREELY, without  hkommedal | 01/30/08
OOXML 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0  alokgovil | 01/30/08
Buy into what you want  Boot_Agnostic | 01/31/08

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here