On TV.com: Confession: I Like THE BIG BANG THEORY
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 12 of 85:
Next »
« Previous
Re: We agree; one Linux distribution wouldn't be missed
And I think the reason Microsoft settled is because the opposition was making too many problems about "Windows".

Nope. MS settled because it was on shaky legal ground and in serious jeopardy of having its "Windows" trademark declared invalid.
Posted by: none none   Posted on: 07/19/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

BWAHAHAHA  OhMyGosh | 07/19/04
They just want the free publicity to stop  Jomo_z | 07/19/04
They do NOT want a legal rulling on the Windows trademark  DonnieBoy | 07/19/04
Disappointing  vferrara | 07/19/04
Microsoft Act As Criminals Once Again  claytonmuhler | 07/19/04
Ludicrous  vferrara | 07/19/04
You moron!  PmAc_z | 07/20/04
Microsoft is paying half the value of the company  Anton Philidor | 07/19/04
No, and 5 more would spring up.. it's called competition.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/19/04
We agree; one Linux distribution wouldn't be missed  Anton Philidor | 07/19/04
Thats so sad  OhMyGosh | 07/19/04
Re: We agree; one Linux distribution wouldn't be missed  none none | 07/19/04
I think they just wanted to avoid a ruling  voska | 07/20/04
The biggest reason MS didn't buy them up...  Michael Kelly | 07/19/04
Because...  hal9000mx | 07/19/04
MS starts buying Linux companies and shutting them down and the justice  DonnieBoy | 07/19/04
I knew it! Microsoft Linux is going to be called Lindows!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/19/04
I'm out with a new distro: Winblows!  chiwawa | 07/19/04
Shhhh!!!!  hal9000mx | 07/19/04
Windoze the viral  ejourner | 07/19/04
Take care when opening cans of worms  tic swayback | 07/19/04
I wonder, though  d_jedi | 07/19/04
Money in a losing cause  tic swayback | 07/19/04
sue them till they can't fight anymore...  ryusen | 07/19/04
I'm not so sure here  tic swayback | 07/19/04
(NT) It could be that the buyout reinforces the invalidity of the trademark  Update victim | 07/19/04
Monopoly  hal9000mx | 07/19/04
Lindows succumbs  georgep_z | 07/19/04
Re: Lindows succumbs  rdwhitti | 07/19/04
Individual companies have to do what is in their best interest, not others  DonnieBoy | 07/19/04
Well, yes....  hal9000mx | 07/19/04
Precedent may have been set  jsjag1 | 07/20/04
I don't trust Lindows.. err.. Linspire  d_jedi | 07/19/04
The beuty of open source, allows lots of business models and inovations.  DonnieBoy | 07/19/04
Busting monoply  jsjag1 | 07/19/04
It could be argued they didn't succumb  Taz_z | 07/19/04
hmmmm  V Sanders | 07/20/04
What about Doors(TM)?  Eggs Ackley_z | 07/19/04
Or the estate of Jim Morrison (nt)  Michael Kelly | 07/19/04
I'm sure they looked at that!  DarbyOhara | 07/19/04
OWNED!  Jomo_z | 07/19/04
Microsoft did NOT want a judgement invalidating their trademark.  DonnieBoy | 07/19/04
Once Again...  hal9000mx | 07/19/04
"We are pleased that Lindows will now compete in the marketplace with a ...  BitTwiddler | 07/19/04
Not but....  hal9000mx | 07/19/04
ok... so what exactly happened?  ryusen | 07/19/04
either that or...  Michael Kelly | 07/19/04
well...  ryusen | 07/19/04
I think it shows...  Michael Kelly | 07/19/04
Nothing to win  tic swayback | 07/19/04
Not it.  Outside T. Box | 07/20/04
suprized  zijiang | 07/19/04
Disappointing  Arrg | 07/19/04
MS was forced sue Lindows in the first place  zijiang | 07/19/04
(NT) Lindows Suks Anyway.....  DarbyOhara | 07/19/04
You don't base a legal system on how much one party sucks  Michael Kelly | 07/19/04
I had the title of your post carved on a plaque...  Anton Philidor | 07/19/04
Not as bad as windows  ejourner | 07/19/04
(NT)  ejourner | 07/19/04
Either way is a win for Linux and Lindows  Linux User 147560 | 07/19/04
Has nothing to do with either - come on!  quietLee | 07/19/04
Your opinion  Linux User 147560 | 07/19/04
Actually, it's a Win for MS, Loss for Lindows  John Zern | 07/19/04
MS's legal team are geniuses. I'm stunned.  el1jones | 07/19/04
Finally! Somebody who gets it! (NT)  Outside T. Box | 07/20/04
What! No blood?  kd5auq | 07/19/04
The End Is Near For Linux  chrislovesdana | 07/19/04
Really?  Linux User 147560 | 07/19/04
ha ha ha  PmAc_z | 07/20/04
Can you do better?  Linux User 147560 | 07/20/04
I hope your still around in the next 10 years  Arrg | 07/19/04
You got it bass-ackwards... Are you related to Enterprise Anal.ist ???  Plain Logic | 07/19/04
Microsoft pays to end Lindows suits  Loverock Davidson | 07/19/04
Re: Microsoft pays to end Lindows suits  none none | 07/19/04
Tenuous hold  jsjag1 | 07/19/04
good bye Lindows, hello Vindows!  dg mh | 07/19/04
Cats out of the bag  jsjag1 | 07/19/04
Hmmm, all I see is chump change for some chumps.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/19/04
All I see...  tic swayback | 07/19/04
Lawsuit Settled  wadeprater | 07/19/04
Speaking of LInux...  John Zern | 07/19/04
OMG - haaaaa  V Sanders | 07/20/04
Winblows  stanleg | 07/20/04
Oh, the close naming leads to this fun  FilledOut | 07/20/04
Lindows ploy worked, they got cash  FilledOut | 07/20/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More