Red Hat restatement triggers legal attacks

TalkBack 9 of 51:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

There it is!

"Call me parinoid but it seems every time linux or a linux company is attacked you know who is pulling some strings or has a connection in the background."

Once again, an article that has nothing to do with Microsoft sparks comments that hint at some kind of conspiracy. Are you saying that MS bribed the accountants that worked for Red Hat? Any evidence whatsoever (however tenuous) that supports this claim?

This is just a case of stockholders getting nervous when a company changes its method of accounting. There was nothing illegal about how Red Hat was doing it, and there's nothing shady about the change. In this day of get-rich-quick and pad the executives, it's udnerstandable that people would be nervous any time things change.

Calm down, not everything's about Microsoft.

Carl Rapson

Posted by: rapson   Posted on: 07/16/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Why Isn't Server Virtualization Saving Us More? A Few Small Changes May Dramatically Increase Your Efficiency VMware Companies have rapidly adopted server virtualization over the past few ... Download Now
• Finally, an easier way for Small and Mid-Sized Companies to Run Their Business Applications: IBM Smart Business IBM From the PC to the Internet to every piece of hardware and software in ... Download Now
• The True Costs of Virtual Server Solutions VMware In an economic environment that is repeatedly heralding the message "do ... Download Now