On CHOW: Girls who hate girly drinks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 17:
Next »
Related Topic
"""Microsoft also unveiled new security technology that will allow IT managers to prevent end users connecting to the corporate network unless their machine has the correct updates and security policies installed.

The Network Access Protection (NAP) technology will detect the "health state" of a PC or laptop attempting to connect to the network and will be shipped as part of the Windows Server 2003 update release, codenamed R2, which is due next year.

Specifically, NAP determines whether a networked client machine is compliant with IT-defined network access policies when they try to connect. It then automatically restricts noncompliant machines to a separate, restricted network where the necessary patch and antivirus updates are available. Once the machine is updated the client is automatically revalidated for network access.

"""

______

How do you say to drop the scraps to the pup then ? When corporations are 'real dogs''. When 'end-user,isn't 'person of use"". And the idea of 'monitor,vrs 'spying seems shameless venture on the ubiquoutous of 'software. Security vrs 'Privacy are relevant in person. So Corp .inc still holds its place ?

To its like reading,oh cherry that the corporation can get some communication,and my dad is coming over the cram some berries on your head or something (lol).

And whatever 'presence to 'MY perspective 'IS the person of use. When microsoft,and others take to indulging in the traits of wich make the networks,and softwares 'volatile,and look at that instead of creating 'blame through statistics basically stolen from its 'end-users (with no other choice evidently). Then base 'privacy in person to that premise - instead of replicating social schema via a non-self evident future. Then you will have a secured Enterprise. But when the 'volitily is the reason of 'security problems,it isn't the ubiquetousness of software,or the 'market residing in it of 'end-use to passion for.

You cannot have enterprise wich spies on its employees,and details this as priviledge to something wich is portrayed as 'common practice to others of associates in enterprise.

News is playing for what it can get.Good luck communicating.

-just talking.
Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 07/14/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Related Topic  ParadigmOdyssey | 07/14/04
Just another ploy...  bjbrock | 07/15/04
Takeover  Spoon Jabber | 07/15/04
How?  rapson | 07/16/04
And in the end...  Michael Kelly | 07/15/04
Of course it does...  Stewart Cannon | 07/15/04
One reason they opened it up  Nullifidian | 07/15/04
Another last gasp for AOL  FilledOut | 07/15/04
Trillian IM client already allows this . . . . .  mdann | 07/15/04
It's not the same thing  Michael Kelly | 07/15/04
This is a business solution  Confused by religion | 07/15/04
Are IM conversations stored?  d_jedi | 07/15/04
MS to pay Royalties?  lemob | 07/15/04
As if AOL (Time Warner) and Yahoo...  Stewart Cannon | 07/15/04
Yawn  d_jedi | 07/15/04
A Few More Notches on BG's Money Clip  tbbrickster_z | 07/16/04
This is the wrong solution  wresnick | 07/16/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here