On CBS.com: Exclusive video from MEDIUM
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 113:
Next »
« Previous
You are a bit confused here
Now you're confusing two issues-- the doctrine of first sale, and
fair use rights. As far as I know, no law has been passed that
has changed the right of first sale:
http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/scc/tutorial/basics2a.html

The First Sale Doctrine
A distinction not always recognized is that ownership of the
physical item, such as a book or a CD, is not the same as owning
the copyright to the work embodied in that item. Under the first
sale doctrine, ownership of a physical copy of a copyrighted
work, like a book, permits lending the item, reselling the item,
disposing of the item, burning the item, and so forth, but it does
not permit copying the item in its entirety. That is because the
transfer of the physical copy does not include transfer of the
copyright to the work. A transfer or assignment of copyright
must be signed and in writing to be valid

And fair use rights:
http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/scc/tutorial/fairuse.html

Fair Use (Overview)
The purpose of the fair use doctrine is to allow limited use of
copyrighted material without requiring prior permission from the
copyright holder. The statute lists four factors to be weighed
when analyzing the proposed use in order to determine whether
it is a fair one. Consideration of all factors is required although
all factors do not have to be in favor of a use to make it a fair
one.


A fair use analysis is necessarily a fact-driven one. Each unique
set of facts regarding a proposed use leads to its own reasoned
conclusion. Reasonable individuals may come to different
conclusions concerning the same set of facts, but the operative
word is "reasonable." If you, as an employee of a nonprofit
educational institution, have made a rational and reasonable, fair
use determination, you are less likely to be targeted for an
infringement lawsuit because of Section 504(c)(2), the "good
faith fair use defense" described later in this section.


The four fair use factors are as follows:


The purpose and character of the use, including whether the use
is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational
purposes;

The nature of the copyrighted work;

The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to
the copyrighted work as a whole; and

The effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of
the copyrighted work.
Posted by: tic swayback   Posted on: 07/14/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Generalize In All The Wrong Places  ParadigmOdyssey | 07/14/04
I determine what to do with my content.. period.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/14/04
Sorry, it's NOT you content.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
First Sale Doctrine  Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/14/04
Yeah, that's why the laws keeping getting tougher.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
What laws?  tic swayback | 07/14/04
I am cerain you are right, nothing is happening to your fair use rights.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
You are a bit confused here  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Whatever, you are still losing them.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Prove it  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Hey, it's you whining about your fair use rights. Not me.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
If something does happen  AbsolutelyNot | 07/14/04
Two different issues, No Ax  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Really, I thought both issues determine what you can do.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Issue of ownership  tic swayback | 07/14/04
He never said anything about copying it online  Jeff Spicoli | 07/14/04
NWOR  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Actually, it is.  Letophoro | 07/14/04
Limited ownership is correct.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
yes but the content creator has no say in it either  voska | 07/14/04
Gee, isn't that what the article said?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Yup, just thought you didn't know that  voska | 07/14/04
That wasn't your argument  Letophoro | 07/14/04
They can do whatever they want.....  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
Spoken like a true thief. (Pirate for the faint of heart.)  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Again with the lies and deceptive language  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Without his hazy lies, Bittie's WHOLE world would fall apart!  Jeff Spicoli | 07/14/04
Sorry, still NWOR.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
No way of replying?  Martin Marvinski | 07/14/04
Not to worry, the scum knows what it means.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
I thought you were above name calling  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Name calling? No, name application.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Okay, but remember this...  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Thank you father tic. Buwahahaha  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
I said "faint of heart" just for you tic.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
You are a manipulative liar  tic swayback | 07/14/04
And your momma wears combat boots.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
A fact, not an insult  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Since when is that an insult?  AbsolutelyNot | 07/14/04
TechDiva, go to your bosses office immediately.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Ah tic my laddy, your gong over the ledge.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
No Ax is an arsonist  tic swayback | 07/14/04
No_ax try Criminal  voska | 07/14/04
Yup, completely over the edge.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Sounds right, maybe I will.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Are the RIAA theives?  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Its nice that you make up such swell stuff.  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
Heard it all before and,,, nothing has changed.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
You must live in a fairy world...  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
Hmmm, what was MS's profits last year?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
You completely miss the point  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
Hmmm, ok, remind me in 100 years then.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
I disagree  voska | 07/14/04
Talk about a one-trick pony...  AbsolutelyNot | 07/14/04
Oh my Gawd, Harry Potter ends all Freedom in USA.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
It just might...  AbsolutelyNot | 07/14/04
exactly!!!  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
Their choice and your choice.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
yay!!!  ickusslime@... | 07/14/04
No clue as to how retail works, I see  AbsolutelyNot | 07/14/04
Sorry TechDiva, you are wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Profits  voska | 07/14/04
No, speed limits are for the worst of drivers.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
No really, consumers have little to say.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
But speed limits are for you  voska | 07/14/04
Speed limits  voska | 07/15/04
By the way, did you ask your boss about "the benjamins" yet?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Well did you ask yet???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Sorry for keeping you in suspense  AbsolutelyNot | 07/14/04
Come on, inquiring minds want to know.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
It's more like "the Georges"  AbsolutelyNot | 07/14/04
Ah, so you suck the public hind teat.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
You really have no clue, do you?  AbsolutelyNot | 07/14/04
No, I did my time with Uncle Sam, then I grew up.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
So it's YOUR fault!  AbsolutelyNot | 07/14/04
Exactly how does one get fired from the DOD after only 8 months?  B.O.F.H. | 07/14/04
sneak up? Already here  voska | 07/14/04
See tic, just for you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Not enough information in this article  Michael Kelly | 07/14/04
Cripes, they just formed the group.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
I'm not criticizing at all  Michael Kelly | 07/14/04
I see some potential here, but...  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Haven't you been following along?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
But they could offer that without DRM  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Maybe in your small world...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
A tiny drop in the bucket  tic swayback | 07/14/04
HDTV are too expensive  voska | 07/14/04
Yup, lots of fools said the same about "color tv".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
yeah but it took time  voska | 07/14/04
How much do those things cost?  tic swayback | 07/14/04
Actually Bit, we haven't been waiting for anything  Jeff Spicoli | 07/14/04
NWOR  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Oooo, Can I guess????  middle of nowhere | 07/15/04
Forced updates  voiceofreason_z | 07/14/04
I see this happening too  Jeff Spicoli | 07/14/04
"allow movie studios to specify exactly what could be done with the video"  BitTwiddler | 07/14/04
Correct, OWNERS decide what to do with their property.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
And that's where they'll blow it  tic swayback | 07/14/04
And that too is their CHOICE.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
Mostly agree here  tic swayback | 07/14/04
I agree there  voska | 07/14/04
Right, and MY choice is  middle of nowhere | 07/15/04
But not what you do with your property  voska | 07/14/04
You got one right...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
All owners = cartel  seosamh_z | 07/14/04
Cartell? Who is stopping you from making a movie?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
I'd like to do that one day  voska | 07/14/04
And i would support your efforts 100%  No_Ax_to_Grind | 07/14/04
missed the point  seosamh_z | 07/14/04
Cannes is part of the cartel  AbsolutelyNot | 07/14/04
You said the MAGIC word!!!  AbsolutelyNot | 07/14/04
Won't work  prong@... | 07/14/04
Couldn't agree more  seosamh_z | 07/14/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement
  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More