On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 21 of 54:
Next »
« Previous
Product design
Many countries have set limits on product design. I know many
here hate it, but look at the Transportation industry. Cars
(Trucks, Motorcycles, etc.) sold in the EU and USA are different.
Even Motorcycle helmets have design limits on them, in the U.S..
They have different standards applied to them. I believe that cars
Sold in Canada are also different (anyone from Canada, feel free
to add to this).

So yes countries have the ability to make demands on vendors.
Why should the software industry be any different? If BMW has to
pass American D.O.T. regulations (U.S. control over a German
design). The EU does the same, on American cars sold in the EU.
So if it's ok for a "Critical" (lives at stake here) industry, then why
not for a less than "Critical" industry? Let's face it BWM and Ford
(as well as the rest of the auto makers) ship vehicles world wide.
They have to make regional specific changes to them.

Why can't MS do the same? Must go back to Microsoft's slogan:

One world
One OS
One software vendor

If it was designed properly, this would not be an issue. Things
like I.E., WMP, MSM, Outlook, etc., should be removable by the
end user. Other Oses can do this. Apple allows the removal of
QuickTime? player, Mail, iTunes?, iDVD?, iPhoto?, DVD player,
Safari, etc. They want the end users to use them. So they work
hard to make them "best in class" applications. iTunes is a very
popular program, along with the iTMS (95+ million songs sold).
End users choose to keep it on their systems. Heck, there are
even windows users that love it. Note, Apple Computer? Inc.
doesn't make the applications unremovable. Microsoft on the
other hand does. Which is a better OS design?
Apple/Linux = modular, unwanted parts removable
Microsoft = one big lump of code, you're stuck with what they
give you.
Posted by: Rick_K   Posted on: 07/03/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story Reply to Message

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Sorry suckers knew they were too guilty!  Jeff Spicoli | 07/02/04
Oh, come on, you could do a lot better here...  quietLee | 07/02/04
was yer basic trolling..  Jeff Spicoli | 07/02/04
LOL  quietLee | 07/02/04
bah... the money is meaningless  ryusen | 07/02/04
nope  V Sanders | 07/04/04
I hope this doesn't effect Secure Computing  Mike Cox | 07/02/04
affect, mike, affect (nt)  eLurker | 07/02/04
Good for you Mike. (NT)  P. Douglas | 07/02/04
if you switch to toast and deli sandwiches ...  oldskool | 07/02/04
8.0  WhoIsDaMan | 07/02/04
An unsecure 7.0  AbsolutelyNot | 07/02/04
pathetic...  DarbyOhara | 07/06/04
I've said all along  rapson | 07/02/04
A settlement, yes...  Anton Philidor | 07/02/04
One thing  Jeff Spicoli | 07/02/04
The law must be specific and the penalty appropriate  Anton Philidor | 07/02/04
has the law ever been this way though  V Sanders | 07/04/04
Even felons have some rights returned  Anton Philidor | 07/04/04
True, but  Linux User 147560 | 07/04/04
Product design  Rick_K | 07/03/04
Control of product design  Anton Philidor | 07/03/04
companies should retain control over the design of their products  NemesisNL | 07/03/04
Please read what I wrote before disagreeing.  Anton Philidor | 07/03/04
MS should not have paid  Enterprise Analyst | 07/02/04
You just don't get it  mabricen | 07/02/04
rose with new name  Rembrandt Pussyhorse | 07/02/04
Could be  AbsolutelyNot | 07/02/04
MS Broke the Law  Stephen Wheeler | 07/02/04
Hit Gates with such a fine already, that will change MS's behaviour!  oldskool | 07/02/04
Well, hold on there...  quietLee | 07/02/04
Stop smoking crack  Bill_gates_Is_SATAN | 07/02/04
Glad to see you obliged  Expatriate US Geek | 07/02/04
Why bother?  Rick_K | 07/03/04
Correction to you  AbsolutelyNot | 07/02/04
$600M To Fund Further Fight Against MS Scams  claytonmuhler | 07/02/04
They better not spend it at all!  amicus_curious | 07/02/04
ummm  eLurker | 07/02/04
Yep  quietLee | 07/02/04
OOOOO, THAT HADDA HURT!!  Eggs Ackley_z | 07/02/04
I got that right here!  amicus_curious | 07/02/04
recent payouts are dipping into almost 10% of the reserve ...  oldskool | 07/02/04
pocket change  V Sanders | 07/04/04
Not really true  Linux User 147560 | 07/04/04
Makes sense  John L. Ries | 07/02/04
Even better than that  amicus_curious | 07/02/04
Pitiful EU  FilledOut | 07/02/04
EU  Enterprise Analyst | 07/02/04
An American living under the repressive jackboot of the EU tyranny  Expatriate US Geek | 07/02/04
Wrong again!  Linux User 147560 | 07/03/04
And you have lived in the EU for how long?  mlindl | 07/04/04
If you read my post above yours  Linux User 147560 | 07/04/04
A drop in the bucket....  Stewart Cannon | 07/02/04
Microsoft didn't pay the fine yet...  SBArbeit | 07/06/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here