On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 14 of 29:
Next »
« Previous
RE: Debating the morality behind software development
I teach an ethics class to engineers at a large state university, and this sort of lunkheaded response to Booch by the interviewer is something that I unfortunately see mirrored in the thinking of many (but not all) of my students.

Booch is trying to call attention to the ethical dimension of engineering and get people to interrogate how personal ethics interact with and impact industrial, academic, and governmental actions. In other words, to accept the fact that the ethics and foresight of engineers greatly impact social progress or decline more generally. But the interviewer won't accept this, because he sees it as an issue of blame and gets defensive and closeminded at the very suggestion of delineating what is responsible or irresponsible engineering and design. It's too hard for him, and many people, to think about the fact that the software you might be writing today may help to destroy an innocent person's life next year.

So instead the interviewer denies the ethical component, and puts all the aegis for ethical action on managers, bureaucrats, or worse yet, the free market (!), completely, and wilfully, missing the point that the things we decide to create (an how we specifically create them) are in large measure our own responsibility. It may be a hard idea to tackle, with all its infinite permutations and complicated extrapolated outcomes, but it's a necessary task, and any engineer worth his or her salt is already thinking about these issues. Apparently, however, technology journalists are not!
Posted by: mintech   Posted on: 10/15/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

(rolling eyes)  wolf_z | 10/15/07
Won't matter in any way, shape or form.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/15/07
Well, that's where the  Badgered | 10/15/07
Manhattan Project  Anton Philidor | 10/15/07
few minor points, but I agree with the conclusion  shryko | 10/15/07
Uh, Anton  Linux User 147560 | 10/15/07
Wouldn't matter.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 10/15/07
And onto advertising  deandonaldson | 10/15/07
Software Morality  ceh4702 | 10/15/07
Software and morality  fsjjunkie | 10/16/07
RE: Debating the morality behind software development  DaveAtFraud | 10/15/07
Nuclear power?  Resuna | 10/15/07
Nuclear Power  fsjjunkie | 10/16/07
RE: Debating the morality behind software development  mintech | 10/15/07
Then touch on the other side  GuidingLight | 10/15/07
Ethical Programming  ceh4702 | 10/16/07
To do or not too do  THEE WOLF | 10/16/07
Lolz!  cardinal4 | 10/16/07
Respect of other's privacy is a moral issue  acarreira | 10/16/07
Become a politician  lena.breijer@... | 10/16/07
Can anybody think of any technology that could not be deployed...  JohnMcGrew@... | 10/16/07
Software Patents Should be Outlawed  ceh4702 | 10/16/07
What is moralilty?  tomnator | 10/16/07
and that  Badgered | 10/16/07
Its not nukes, its dictatorships.  lschw1 | 10/16/07
1984-- Today  Wudpecker13@... | 10/16/07
Kermit software - only for "peaceful and humane purposes"  jcd-zdnet@... | 10/16/07
RE: Debating the morality behind software development  jhollingworth | 10/16/07
RE: Debating the morality behind software development  blindspeed | 10/18/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and