On mySimon: Skullcandy Hesh Headphones
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 8 of 18:
Next »
« Previous
MS revisionist history as no bribe needed
>>> We in the US understand that Judge Jackson had an alterior motive, and one must conclude that Judge Jackson was bribed, as their was a bias later in the hearings that did not exist at the begining, an "over-night" turn a around as it were. >>>

Of course that change in attitude ("new-found bias") had nothing to do with Microsoft's behaviour in Jackson's court room. (one thing you never do is piss off and disrespect a judge in his own court room, or you can expect to pay the consequences, as MS found out).

>>> "he's so far from anything that seems benign." Jackson's conduct "violates the whole oath of office" >>>

He spoke the truth and was rightfully "punished" for it.

>>> The ruling (only the split up of MS) was overturned by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in June 2001, which criticized Jackson's conduct. In part, the court found "the actions of the trial judge seriously tainted the proceedings before the District Court and called into question the integrity of the judicial process ... The judge's conduct during the case was later found to have unfairly favored the prosecution >>>

Jackson called 'em as he saw 'em. The evidence and MS's own conduct left him very little choice.

>>> Yes, we in the US are samrt enough to know when someone was getting bribed, and it's obvious Jackson was one on the take from MS's competitors. >>>

Funny as Jackson was originally seen as being "business friendly" and had actually ruled favorably for MS in past MS anti-trust court proceedings.

see wired...
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2002/11/35212

specifically mid-90's...
July 94 - MS signs consent decree
Aug 95 - Jackson approves decree
Oct 97 - DOJ wants to fine MS $1M per day for violation of decree
Dec 97 - Jackson hears case
Dec 97 - Jackson rejects DOJ fine (sought to restrain how the company leverages its marketplace dominance in desktop operating systems)

Seems Jackson helped out MS here and hardly considered an "enemy", thus MS's acceptance of him as the later anti-trust trial judge (perhaps thinking they had another MS patsy).

Bottom line... Microsoft was it's own worst enemy re evidence, lies, obfuscation, disingenuous testimony, faked video, etc.

try...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft

"Trial" section re Gates' deposition (most of 2nd paragraph), tainted video evidence, damning e-mails, etc.

Also "Appeal"...

"The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Judge Jackson's rulings against Microsoft. This was in part because the Appellate court had adopted a "drastically altered scope of liability" under which the Remedies could be taken, but also due to the embargoed interviews Judge Jackson had given to the news media while he was still hearing the case, in violation of the Code of Conduct for US Judges "

"Judge Jackson's response to this was that Microsoft's conduct itself was the cause of any "perceived bias"; Microsoft executives had "proved, time and time again, to be inaccurate, misleading, evasive, and transparently false. ... Microsoft is a company with an institutional disdain for both the truth and for rules of law that lesser entities must respect. It is also a company whose senior management is not averse to offering specious testimony to support spurious defenses to claims of its wrongdoing."

but "However, the appeals court did not overturn the findings of fact. The D.C. Circuit remanded the case for consideration of a proper remedy under a more limited scope of liability."

Any wonder Jackson became "biased" against an apparently guilty MS. No bribes needed as MS did it to itself.

...
Posted by: MacCanuck   Posted on: 10/11/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

confidentiality agreement  mighetto | 10/10/07
err Microsoft are the market leaders  mrjonno | 10/10/07
was Judge Jjackson bribed?  John Zern | 10/10/07
Jackson gave up his likely Supreme Court nomination to alert the world  mighetto | 10/10/07
He did not  John Zern | 10/10/07
Judge Jackson is one of Americas Greatest Hero Patriots  mighetto | 10/10/07
Awww...they should be looted! wink (NT)  nomoremicrosoft | 10/11/07
MS revisionist history as no bribe needed  MacCanuck | 10/11/07
Au contraire, mon frere!  1stcyberian | 10/10/07
Have hope my brother  mighetto | 10/10/07
Quaint..hmmm...i guess you're not aware  xuniL_z | 10/11/07
Conflicting statements  Larsix | 10/10/07
Simple solution  Omch'Ar | 10/10/07
The UK is being pressured by the US...  bjbrock | 10/10/07
War on terror  mrjonno | 10/11/07
What phrase?  xuniL_z | 10/11/07
Actually this is all very simple  BobF_z | 10/11/07
Use of force...?  Wolfie2K3 | 10/11/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and