Tech heavies support challenge to copyright law

TalkBack 26 of 29:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

Copyfriendly Products

wich are complementary to those wich RIAA vehemeniantly rejects should be something endorsed via the bill. Something sustaining 'copyfriendly cannot be prohibited via DMCA.

Even 'with DRM,DMCA 'copy locks. The idea of shading what the technology provides by using the 'encryption lock' is nothing new. But what is 'new is the technology itself wich creates new distributive means of doing just that with 'copyrighted works.

If you take for example the DVD x copy that through the courts is trying to hang some favor the technology meant for consumers,are the consumers 'right of 'fair-use of purchases the 'own. Hollywood does not want to debate the 'asset side of the products,nor give credit to the technologies distributive enhancements of copyrighted features. But if you look,there isn't anybody to accuse DVD x copy of something - the idea being they haven't violated 'copyright law,but have violated DMCA via that acredation validated via the 'distribution industry. If it was a technology in and of itself,the aspect of 'copyfriendly wears would be known to that premise of enhancement it endorses through some structure of 'standard reference,and competitive for wich the 'trait is known among them. So that for example DVD x copy could simply be 'shipped with DVDs,or an mp3 'ripper ''sold ''by retail outlets within an aspect of 'copyfriendly.

For now,there is simply the piracy premise,wich the industy of a mere 7 music labels,and several movie industries look at. A 'standard for products wich are 'copyfriendly should be the 'label setting'' coordination. Because it is the predecate for wich commerce can maintain its value in accessory. Even though those wich conclude the comparison one and the same object,and they are not. The object wich pertains to the distributor,is not the same as pertains to the person who owns it. That 'asset wich pertains to performance,and right'' in copyright are different.

The internet''in a generalality merely takes the focus away from the real asset wich the technology pertains to in its feature and focus of 'copyright enhanced distribution''.

DRM cannot be from a sole proprietor as well. Wich encompasses taking arbitration away from consumers within the performance of their store bought goods. Labeling the 'traits for performance in exactly what 'copyfriendly ' portrays for 'any copyrighted work,can be done easily by creating the specification for it. Wether digital,media disk,download,rental, - as long as the specification is taken to denote what the consumer can expect. And along with reciept the arbitration among proprietors to identify in terms of support,definition usability among them as well.

But you cant have a single party claiming all of copyrights to be one and the same. Since by practice there are many different relationships to the goods themselves,and persons of wich utilize them.

But a specification is needed beyond the piracy premise. Wich can categorize what can be expected,wich portrays arbitration to be with the buyer,not the seller.

-just talking.

Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey   Posted on: 06/22/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Iinfrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now
• Wireless Lab Delivers Technology and a Better Education Dell Steve Spangler, assistant principal of Middlesboro Middle School in ... Download Now
• The Impact of Virtualization Software on Operating Environments VMware Today's use of virtualization technology allows IT professionals to ... Download Now