On CBS MoneyWatch: Report: Tiger to Pay Wife $60 Million
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 18 of 29:
Next »
« Previous
It's legal to do what's legal
This quote from the article shows the DMCA's tormented logic:

Boucher's bill says that descrambling utilities can be distributed, and copy protection can be circumvented as long as no copyright infringement is taking place.

One participant in the coalition, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said its members already have met with representatives of more than 20 congressional offices. Their sales pitch: Beyond harming "fair use" rights, the DMCA also endangers computer research vital to national security.


Think about this description of the intent of the proposed law: "... copy protection can be circumvented as long as no copyright infringement is taking place."

So under current law the situation is: Bypassing copy protection for legitimate purposes is illegal.
Or, DRM may be used to prevent people from legal use of materials they purchased.

This will not be a surprise to those who have followed the actions of Congress, but it's worth stating clearly here.

The proposed law makes it legal to do something legal. And it's being fought against.

The argument in favor is not just, "Have you noticed we [Congress] did something stupid?" It's "DRM helps terrorists by harming National Security research."
That's a ridiculous argument. I'd like to see RIAA take government security researchers to court. I'd pay for tickets. But this argument may be the only way to persuade Congress to do something sensible.
So go for it!

You might also notice how much impact all your letters had. There's a chance for results when the issue is bothering the important constituents, the manufacturing companies.
I'm not happy about that, either.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 06/22/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

A step in the right direction  tamuhockey | 06/22/04
Let's hope so  Spoon Jabber | 06/22/04
What are you talking about?  RedHat9User | 06/22/04
politics  Grastar | 06/22/04
haha, now that is funny (NT)  V Sanders | 06/23/04
of course not everyone in plitics is...  ryusen | 06/22/04
It's about time...  Tim Patterson | 06/22/04
An end to prohibition in sight?  George Mitchell | 06/22/04
who cares  lotta_anger | 06/22/04
Lots of great movies out there  voska | 06/22/04
I miss the old DriveINs from when I was younger  V Sanders | 06/23/04
let's be fair to bush here...  ryusen | 06/22/04
Fair?  Update victim | 06/22/04
but he didn't purpose thee bills,  ryusen | 06/23/04
People just download it music  voska | 06/22/04
Where's Don/Bit/No_Ax?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 06/22/04
Question about Germany and copy protections  Anton Philidor | 06/22/04
It's legal to do what's legal  Anton Philidor | 06/22/04
Right Anton...  Tim Patterson | 06/22/04
Copy Protected Album Sells  Bill4 | 06/22/04
Guess the RIAA and members don't have enough money  FilledOut | 06/22/04
Labeling is GOOD!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
So where are you bit?  Tim Patterson | 06/22/04
Sorry, haven't had a chance to read it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/22/04
they need to go further than that...  ryusen | 06/22/04
Copyfriendly Products  ParadigmOdyssey | 06/22/04
Copy Protection Labels  Update victim | 06/22/04
I agree  V Sanders | 06/23/04
who owns what we buy?  V Sanders | 06/23/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here