- TalkBack 12 of 18:
- Next »
- « Previous
- Thread View
- Flat View
- What we Need Is a Privacy Law
-
in place. Before we go spelling what anybody can do with it. If you look at any of those,they consider only the user,rather than the person.The same problem wich cascades across the benifit of the computer itself - this is a machine,but I am a person.
If it was that the amendments of the constitution applied to the person .Then something could be said about what companies should do with their wares.
Since most privacy situations from law,simply put exemplory notations to their agreements to do what they wanted to do.
So it isn't law that one should expect their privacy.And business does not adhear to constitutional protections as we know that form government conduct. In the same way the government will 'outsource to provide the same conduit of 'doing what I want to do with a persons privacy''. You see that in the bill of wich gives the attorney general rights to sue ,on the part of copyright violation. However as you have rights to your accuser - the attorney general cannot be representative of all copyrights. They are individual,and that is the detail of wich hollywood may owe large sums for copyrights due to the digital technologie of wich they only have rights to distribute for x media .. and so on.
So there cannot be any kind of base for wich to start creating privacy for individuals unless business as well as government expects the same to themselves as anyone else could expect from a law.
My point of view as far as broadcast flag - is that it violates the constitution of illegal search and seizure.
Believe it someone is holding all these marks in scale.
It is true they cannot start where it ended. They must start where it begins.That is with a privacy law representing the person only.
Here the 'liscencing affect gets involved to hold some kind of refrain,to say that the person cannot arbitrate on their behalf between proprietors. This too is an ignoring of persons,.
The perspective wont change until it is considered to be illegal to invade the privacy of a person. Thus contents of person in corporation must be considered that of person 'inc. To something different from person 'respect of person in papers and documents - of wich our electronics now contains. So you could not leave those documents without the person,or to 'liberate from that person them casually.
That 'casually is also at arms length incidently . If it is only electronic,or worldwide web based. As we have a right to keep and bear arms. If the computer is equiped as it is our own abode - it would be clear what a decision of what privacy would be meant to mean.
Wouldn't be a situation of catering to IP addresses,web adress,email ids. The person isn't spelled out through them. The person is before them always known to have their own privacy.
That is incidently how one differentiates 'fair-use. The fact that copy is maintained within the integrity of ones person concludes that they can defend what they hold as their own property.(wether or not hollywood wants to debate that asset). It had been the ruling exception that distribution had to be provable.
Privacy cannot be provable w/o first defining as coinciding to its correct person as well. Just what or who is connecting the dots is up to you as that private individual person within there own constitutional relationship of personal security. Because we may not be able to define it for the government,or business. But should have a law to include it from being violated.
-just talking. - Posted by: ParadigmOdyssey Posted on: 06/18/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What do you think?
SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads
- Email Security and Archiving - Clearer in the Cloud Google The time is NOW for businesses and organizations of all sizes to implement ... Download Now
- Virtualization: Architectural Considerations And Other Evaluation Criteria VMware Of the many approaches to x86 systems virtualization available in the ... Download Now
- Three Steps You Need to Know to Stop Data Loss Varonis Sensitive data exposed to misuse or loss... it is the stuff of nightmares ... Download Now
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
- New Online Dashboard for IT Leaders
-
Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost-effective solutions to real-life IT problems.
- Learn more >>
- The best support in the Linux business
-
If Linux is going to power your mission-critical applications, you'd better have the best support known to business. Novell was rated the top provider of Linux technical support.

- Learn more >>
- Learn more about tools to grow your business
-
The Business Essentials Guide provides you useful tools and templates to help grow your business and save you time with automated shipping solutions.
- Save time with the UPS Business Essentials Guide
- Keep Up With The Latest In Document Management with The DocuMentor.
-
Doc delivers the scoop on today's enterprise content management, printer maintenance, and all other issues related to document management. It's the DocuMentor Blog.
- Learn more >>
- Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online - Free Six-Month Trial for Eligible Organizations
-
Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online provides fast online access, simple contact management and better sales performance for a low monthly cost - the best value on the market today.

- Learn more about the free, six-month trial offer>>
SmartPlanet
- Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
- More from IBM
- How to Drive Better Business Outcomes with Exceptional Web Experiences Download the eBook
- Driving Business Agility through SOA Connectivity & Integration Read the White Paper from IBM
- Linking Decisions and Information for Organizational Performance Read the Tom Davenport study





