Mixed rulings advance two SCO cases

TalkBack 22 of 37:

Next »

« Previous

• Thread View
• Flat View

One sided? How?

He gave a pretty decent analysis. One that's is echoed on the internet in various news sites by various experts. It's not a good sign if a judge expresses doubt about the main argument of your case. It almost always sends a signall that the plaintiff better come up with some pretty good arguments because the judge is allready moving in the opposite direction. Unless SCO can magically produce a contract that specifically says that the seller conveyed copyrights, and follows that up with a list of the specific copyrights, nothing was transfered and SCO therefore does not have the copyrights. I think we can fairly assume there is no such contract. SCO would have shown it by now and Novell wouldn't have made bold statements about it still being the owner of said copyrights.

How this can be a onesided view escapes me.

Posted by: NemesisNL   Posted on: 06/11/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

• Building the Virtualized Enterprise with VMware Infrastructure VMware VMware virtualization software has been adopted by over 120,000 enterprise ... Download Now
• Reducing Server Total Cost of Ownership with VMware Virtualization Software VMware VMware virtualization enables customers to reduce their server TCO and ... Download Now
• VMware Infrastructure: A Guide to Bottom-Line Benefits VMware Frustrated by the costs of maintain ever larger data centers?or building ... Download Now