On CHOW: The most delicious sandwiches
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 27 of 55:
Next »
« Previous
Obviously the CVS site must not be secure.
They are cleaning their own site because of this code. They do no practice what you preach. Why should we assume that the OSS database is secure?
Also don't you find it a little bit curious that they say they never claimed it was secure and yet they opened themselves up to attack? They also state the vulnerability exploits any remote protocol. VPN is nothing more then a secure remote protocol.
Posted by: ShadeTree   Posted on: 06/10/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use
Reply to Story No further replies to this post will be accepted.

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Exceeding expectations  Martin Marvinski | 06/09/04
You sound a bit defensive  mojoman_x@... | 06/09/04
What?!  Jeff Spicoli | 06/09/04
crimes  richhayes | 06/10/04
crimes  georgep_z | 06/10/04
Ummm.... ?  Martin Marvinski | 06/09/04
Way to spin the story.  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
But what you forget to mention.  nucrash | 06/10/04
What in the world....  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Simple  nucrash | 06/10/04
So in response....  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Why respond to your post?  Martin Marvinski | 06/10/04
Thanks for adding to the FUD  rock06r | 06/10/04
Whats a "M$ shills"  Da-Man | 06/10/04
No it is definitely Shill  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Nice spin...  Martin Marvinski | 06/10/04
I would agree except...  ShadeTree | 06/11/04
From the home page of the CVS Project site.  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
seems like  doh123 | 06/10/04
If you have access....  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Code on CVS has official maintainer(s)  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Only official maintainers are supposed...  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Internet ?? WWW  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
I have confused nothing  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
From the CVS Project web site  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
RE: From the CVS Project web site  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Obviously the CVS site must not be secure.  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
More proof open source works.. and quickly!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 06/09/04
Uh huh  wolf_z | 06/10/04
wolf: Don't reply to this SHRILL above  Da-Man | 06/10/04
Do you even know what the term refers to?  rock06r | 06/10/04
Alternatives?  doe_z | 06/09/04
CVS alternatives  Chris Moller | 06/10/04
(NT)The VPN method is a good idea  toadlife | 06/09/04
More flaws foul security of open-source repository  Loverock Davidson | 06/10/04
Loverock's pick  dwest_z | 06/10/04
How sweet!  Loverock Davidson | 06/10/04
linux what?  ryusen | 06/10/04
If they could just deliver a secure OS without bugs.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/10/04
Yeah, Zealots are like flaws  nucrash | 06/10/04
Touch?  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Meh,  nucrash | 06/10/04
Good idea, just wrong phrase  rock06r | 06/10/04
OS? what?  doh123 | 06/10/04
Still it's a security flaw that could breach OS code  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
If they could just deliver a secure OS without bugs.  Loverock Davidson | 06/10/04
Close the door on 'free' non-professional software  Andreas_Gruenbaum | 06/10/04
Bigger priorities  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
This problem is being addressed in SP2.(nt)  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Good. I wish them luck. (nt)  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Check out: http://www.ghs.com  Da-Man | 06/10/04
Just a clue...  Linux User 147560 | 06/10/04
Should be: Close the door on non-professional software.  doe_z | 06/10/04
Zdnet, you're posters have warned you about  FilledOut | 06/10/04
There's always SecurID ...  George Mitchell | 06/10/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here