On CHOW: Holiday side dishes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 52 of 55:
Next »
« Previous
Just a clue...
if it wasn't for a lot of that "free" software, your beloved Microsoft would still be in the stone ages of computing. There is plenty of software both open and closed, free and purchased out there that is safe and usable. On the flip of the coin, there is a lot of software both open and closed and free and purchased that is pure utter crap and not worth the time or investment.

Your short narrow minded thought process on Open Source and free software is exactly the mentallity that will stifle innovation, creativity as well as the forward momentum of the computing world.

I use a mix of both worlds, and am very productive in my job. And now because of Open Source and the cluster projects, my company will be moving from big servers to scalable clusters to run our databases. Why? It saves us money as a company that I and the other employees get to see with better health and dental benefits, bonus checks, pay raises. It also allows us the flexibility to scale our system to our needs as we need it. Yes you can do that with servers, but the cost.... okay it's cheaper to build a cluster and own the hardware and software than to rent the hardware. Then the scaling up, if we need to increase our capacity beyond what the current server needs, and we don't have another server available.... then there is the delivery, installation, tuning tweaking and finally paralleling. With a cluster we can have 10% over our capacity planned into the system... power on tie in done.


Bottom line is that I am most glad I do not work for you or your company, since I would most likely quit if I was not allowed to use my Linux laptop to perform my duties, like I am now. Hey saves the company money again! One less license for various software and OS that can be applied elsewhere.

Grow up and buy a clue, both systems offer solutions that work. A mix of the two is good on many fronts.
Posted by: Linux User 147560   Posted on: 06/10/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Exceeding expectations  Martin Marvinski | 06/09/04
You sound a bit defensive  mojoman_x@... | 06/09/04
What?!  Jeff Spicoli | 06/09/04
crimes  richhayes | 06/10/04
crimes  georgep_z | 06/10/04
Ummm.... ?  Martin Marvinski | 06/09/04
Way to spin the story.  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
But what you forget to mention.  nucrash | 06/10/04
What in the world....  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Simple  nucrash | 06/10/04
So in response....  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Why respond to your post?  Martin Marvinski | 06/10/04
Thanks for adding to the FUD  rock06r | 06/10/04
Whats a "M$ shills"  Da-Man | 06/10/04
No it is definitely Shill  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Nice spin...  Martin Marvinski | 06/10/04
I would agree except...  ShadeTree | 06/11/04
From the home page of the CVS Project site.  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
seems like  doh123 | 06/10/04
If you have access....  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Code on CVS has official maintainer(s)  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Only official maintainers are supposed...  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Internet ?? WWW  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
I have confused nothing  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
From the CVS Project web site  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
RE: From the CVS Project web site  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Obviously the CVS site must not be secure.  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
More proof open source works.. and quickly!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 06/09/04
Uh huh  wolf_z | 06/10/04
wolf: Don't reply to this SHRILL above  Da-Man | 06/10/04
Do you even know what the term refers to?  rock06r | 06/10/04
Alternatives?  doe_z | 06/09/04
CVS alternatives  Chris Moller | 06/10/04
(NT)The VPN method is a good idea  toadlife | 06/09/04
More flaws foul security of open-source repository  Loverock Davidson | 06/10/04
Loverock's pick  dwest_z | 06/10/04
How sweet!  Loverock Davidson | 06/10/04
linux what?  ryusen | 06/10/04
If they could just deliver a secure OS without bugs.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/10/04
Yeah, Zealots are like flaws  nucrash | 06/10/04
Touch?  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Meh,  nucrash | 06/10/04
Good idea, just wrong phrase  rock06r | 06/10/04
OS? what?  doh123 | 06/10/04
Still it's a security flaw that could breach OS code  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
If they could just deliver a secure OS without bugs.  Loverock Davidson | 06/10/04
Close the door on 'free' non-professional software  Andreas_Gruenbaum | 06/10/04
Bigger priorities  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
This problem is being addressed in SP2.(nt)  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Good. I wish them luck. (nt)  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Check out: http://www.ghs.com  Da-Man | 06/10/04
Just a clue...  Linux User 147560 | 06/10/04
Should be: Close the door on non-professional software.  doe_z | 06/10/04
Zdnet, you're posters have warned you about  FilledOut | 06/10/04
There's always SecurID ...  George Mitchell | 06/10/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement