On TechRepublic: 10 cool USB flash drive tricks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 31 of 55:
Next »
« Previous
Do you even know what the term refers to?
Ok, let me explain it this way then. Have you seen any AMIGA or Commodore 64 viruses lately? Well, why not? I don't think they have new antivirus software or firewalls out on the market for them. Could it be, for some strange reason, that virus writers would be WASTING their time trying to write viruses for the 3 dozen remaining Commodore systems out there, that the chance of infected them -other than MAYBE the first one- is virtually NIL?

OK, that is what security by obscurity means. FEW systems to infect. FEW systems that are interconnected. Capiche? That and nothing else. Nothing about development systems, CVS's, finding flaws in OSS or proprietary anything (and BTW: Commodore was VERY proprietary).

Now I know what some of you IT mavons are going to say: BUT WHAT ABOUT ALL THE LINUX SERVERS? O, the one's being run by IT professionals, the one's behind firewalls, NAT systems, etc.? Let's compare apples to apples, and not confuse the virus headlines that refer to home PCs with the Linux server systems that you are invariably going to rave about. Linux folks always rave about how secure their systems are, but honestly, have linux PC's been tested the way MS systems have? MS systems have to contend with hundreds of new Viruses a Year, and how many have been written to attack Linux/Unix thus far? A few dozen? Check your virus definition files... look at the size of them... NOW do you get the term "security by obscurity"? Why would any self-respecting hacker write malicious code to attack 3% of the PC populace, when they can spend just as much time attacking the other 90+% of MS PCs?

Sorry for the lesson, just thought you should know before you start talking about it or rant about "intelligent key encryption" next...?!
Posted by: rock06r   Posted on: 06/10/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Exceeding expectations  Martin Marvinski | 06/09/04
You sound a bit defensive  mojoman_x@... | 06/09/04
What?!  Jeff Spicoli | 06/09/04
crimes  richhayes | 06/10/04
crimes  georgep_z | 06/10/04
Ummm.... ?  Martin Marvinski | 06/09/04
Way to spin the story.  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
But what you forget to mention.  nucrash | 06/10/04
What in the world....  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Simple  nucrash | 06/10/04
So in response....  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Why respond to your post?  Martin Marvinski | 06/10/04
Thanks for adding to the FUD  rock06r | 06/10/04
Whats a "M$ shills"  Da-Man | 06/10/04
No it is definitely Shill  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Nice spin...  Martin Marvinski | 06/10/04
I would agree except...  ShadeTree | 06/11/04
From the home page of the CVS Project site.  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
seems like  doh123 | 06/10/04
If you have access....  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Code on CVS has official maintainer(s)  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Only official maintainers are supposed...  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Internet ?? WWW  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
I have confused nothing  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
From the CVS Project web site  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
RE: From the CVS Project web site  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Obviously the CVS site must not be secure.  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
More proof open source works.. and quickly!  Xunil_Sierutuf | 06/09/04
Uh huh  wolf_z | 06/10/04
wolf: Don't reply to this SHRILL above  Da-Man | 06/10/04
Do you even know what the term refers to?  rock06r | 06/10/04
Alternatives?  doe_z | 06/09/04
CVS alternatives  Chris Moller | 06/10/04
(NT)The VPN method is a good idea  toadlife | 06/09/04
More flaws foul security of open-source repository  Loverock Davidson | 06/10/04
Loverock's pick  dwest_z | 06/10/04
How sweet!  Loverock Davidson | 06/10/04
linux what?  ryusen | 06/10/04
If they could just deliver a secure OS without bugs.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/10/04
Yeah, Zealots are like flaws  nucrash | 06/10/04
Touch?  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Meh,  nucrash | 06/10/04
Good idea, just wrong phrase  rock06r | 06/10/04
OS? what?  doh123 | 06/10/04
Still it's a security flaw that could breach OS code  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
If they could just deliver a secure OS without bugs.  Loverock Davidson | 06/10/04
Close the door on 'free' non-professional software  Andreas_Gruenbaum | 06/10/04
Bigger priorities  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
This problem is being addressed in SP2.(nt)  ShadeTree | 06/10/04
Good. I wish them luck. (nt)  Michael Kelly | 06/10/04
Check out: http://www.ghs.com  Da-Man | 06/10/04
Just a clue...  Linux User 147560 | 06/10/04
Should be: Close the door on non-professional software.  doe_z | 06/10/04
Zdnet, you're posters have warned you about  FilledOut | 06/10/04
There's always SecurID ...  George Mitchell | 06/10/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here