On mySimon: Holiday Gifts Under $50
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 1 of 12:
Next »
Needs a paper receipt
It really needs a paper receipt, disclosing the source is fine and a good step forward, but these are general purpose computing platforms they're using.

If I wanted to change an election, I could run *extra* software on them to change the vote, I could run *a different version of the voting software* on them to change the vote. Because I can change the software without leaving an audit trail on a general purpose computer, it makes them vulnerable to attack.

Personally, a simple paper roll printer locked inside the machine printing out the votes, with the vote just cast visible through a slot window till the person clicks 'accept'/removes their voting card.
Posted by: Nigel Johnstone   Posted on: 06/08/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Needs a paper receipt  Nigel Johnstone | 06/08/04
The VOTER needs the paper reciept!  kd5auq | 06/09/04
I'm telling you ... just count the votes along with the mega-ball ticket  oldskool | 06/09/04
both actually.  ryusen | 06/09/04
Profit from VOTING?  kd5auq | 06/09/04
It will be rigged no matter what  Jeff Spicoli | 06/09/04
No it won't  TrustMe_z | 06/09/04
makes sense ... provide a paper back up to be contested to verify eCount  oldskool | 06/09/04
Who knows what nasties hide in closed-source systems  Xunil_Sierutuf | 06/09/04
but isn't it better if a computer prints out the answer?  oldskool | 06/09/04
Imagine if the lottery was as rigged as voting?  oldskool | 06/09/04
cant agree more  g_ludlow | 06/10/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here