On last.fm: Radiohead - Listen free and discover!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 3 of 15:
Next »
« Previous
Patent defines..
..can never be done in a universally appropriate way when it comes to software.
The best is to quit them all together.

But it's no question how Microsoft would have acted if being the counterpart instead.
Posted by: pj-xmesh   Posted on: 06/08/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Patent office needs revamping  FilledOut | 06/08/04
best of luck ot MS but...  ryusen | 06/08/04
Patent defines..  pj-xmesh | 06/08/04
MS has never enforced an IP claim  rg807 | 06/08/04
Microsoft has never had a valid patent  voiceofreason_z | 06/08/04
complementary  pj-xmesh | 06/08/04
General Hypcracy  aureolin@... | 06/08/04
Exactly..the hypocrisy just drips off it  Jeff Spicoli | 06/08/04
What do you expect...  vferrara | 06/08/04
Not really.  Fred Fredrickson | 06/08/04
Ok on one hand  Arrg | 06/08/04
Name a patent MS has enforced  rg807 | 06/08/04
Name a patent MS deserved to get granted  voiceofreason_z | 06/08/04
What did Eolas patent that wasn't obvious (NT)  vferrara | 06/08/04
Where was that list of MS initiated patent suits  FilledOut | 06/09/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here