On mySimon: North Face Elkhorn 0 Degree Sleeping Bag
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 39 of 48:
Next »
« Previous
Be Careful How You Bend Your Perspective
?What makes you say that? Do you have any examples of open
source programs that have "forked many times over"? Let's see
now. Apache. How many times has that forked? Zero. Linux?
Zero. (Note: There are different distributions, but the Linux
kernel has never forked. Developers can use that kernel to build
a variety of different distributions, specialized for different
markets and purposes. That's how it is supposed to work.) The
last time I can remember an open source project fork was when
Jamie Zawinski released Lucent Emacs, which sparked a
controversy that lasted for years. ?

You?ve got to be kidding. Are you saying that just because the various Linux distributions have roughly 10% identical code (the kernel) in them, they are the same? (See general comparison of kernel vs. OS sizes for various OSs here to obtain a rule of thumb concerning kernel and OS sizes [http://www.base.com/gordoni/os-sizes.html].) Therefore variations in 90% of Linux code counts for nothing? (This link [http://moochers.com/LinuxSite/index.html?ldistros.html] proves my point that there is substantial variation of the Linux OS out there ? including embedded versions of Linux.)

Further, this other link shows varied OSs from different distributors (from IBM to Apple) that all use the Mach kernel (http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Mach-kernel).

Quite frankly, to say that forking does not occur in OSS is bending one?s view of OSS to a spectacular degree.
Posted by: P. Douglas   Posted on: 06/07/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

And this pays the stockholders how?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/04/04
Sun really just sells hardware  Rembrandt Pussyhorse | 06/04/04
Same way they get cash from OOo  nucrash | 06/04/04
think investors would come if  V Sanders | 06/04/04
Yes  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/04/04
I don't plan to invest  V Sanders | 06/06/04
Sorry, but it hasn't worked for them yet.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/04/04
care to describe how closed source has helped them?  oldskool | 06/04/04
Solaris is free???? Not anywhere I can see.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/06/04
They are giving it away for free right now.  DonnieBoy | 06/04/04
Maybe that's the problem  seosamh_z | 06/04/04
No, the problem is...  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/04/04
That's not the way it works  seosamh_z | 06/05/04
I already explained that.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/05/04
Doesn't make it any more correct  seosamh_z | 06/05/04
Open source Java would rule...  prime21 | 06/04/04
I do worry about incapatabilities  nucrash | 06/04/04
that is the best part  V Sanders | 06/04/04
then again  V Sanders | 06/04/04
..would rule Java  seosamh_z | 06/04/04
Alternative implementations drive progress, single source stagnates ideas  oldskool | 06/04/04
Don't think it's so black and white  seosamh_z | 06/04/04
innovation by a more understood name is PROTECTIONISM  oldskool | 06/04/04
Don't be silly  seosamh_z | 06/05/04
Not according to Scott's latest response  Iain_Peters | 06/04/04
next announcement will be they open sourced Scott!  oldskool | 06/04/04
what?  V Sanders | 06/04/04
The battle with Microsoft was to stop MS from polluting it...  Plain Logic | 06/04/04
How would that work now?  seosamh_z | 06/04/04
Did I miss something?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/04/04
Yes  seosamh_z | 06/05/04
Now you're arguing in bad faith.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/05/04
You live up to my expectation of you  seosamh_z | 06/05/04
no  V Sanders | 06/06/04
You Are Correct  P. Douglas | 06/05/04
Damn, I was going to say that happy (NT)  seosamh_z | 06/05/04
Well stated  rapson | 06/05/04
You are incorrect.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/05/04
Be Careful How You Bend Your Perspective  P. Douglas | 06/07/04
(Reposting Message Because of Links)  P. Douglas | 06/07/04
If you can't compete against MS, hitch a ride on the OSS choo choo train ..  P. Douglas | 06/04/04
That IS how to compete with Microsoft.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/05/04
That's not outsmarting anybody  seosamh_z | 06/06/04
Once again, you're just arguing against your own straw man.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 06/06/04
Whatever you say.  seosamh_z | 06/06/04
Oooh, someday  FilledOut | 06/05/04
Yes, just hand it over to IBM. NOT!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 06/06/04
I used to love  V Sanders | 06/06/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline