Microsoft tries evading new GPL grasp
Loverock Davidson | 07/06/07
|
Haven't done your homework, eh Loverock?
Tony Agudo | 07/06/07
|
Loverock Needs To Read Groklaw
dumptux | 07/08/07
|
No need to
Loverock Davidson | 07/09/07
|
Sounds like what we always say! 
DemonX | 07/09/07
|
|
How original
Loverock Davidson | 07/09/07
|
|
Nothing too much original here
PeterPilot | 07/10/07
|
|
" re-read their license?"
Ole Man | 07/09/07
|
|
Microsoft is NOT subject to the GPL?
ruped24 | 07/06/07
|
|
Yup
Tim Patterson | 07/08/07
|
|
It's all BSD and GPL 2.0 only
orcmid | 07/09/07
|
|
Re: Microsoft tries evading new GPL grasp
none none | 07/06/07
|
|
MS don't like you, and you don't like MS
Boot_Agnostic | 07/07/07
|
|
Rep has shown me the legal framework...
Mike Cox | 07/07/07
|
|
Funny to wath Billy and Stevie squirm. They would love to sue the snot out
DonnieBoy | 07/07/07
|
|
This "Legal Framework" May Have Consequences for MS
dumptux | 07/08/07
|
|
RE:This "Legal Framework" May Have Consequences for MS
joe6pack_z | 07/11/07
|
|
Microsoft Services for UNIX Discussion
stephe | 07/09/07
|
|
you'd think it were politics....
fireman949 | 07/09/07
|
|
oops.. see Loverocks posts for clarity (NT)
fireman949 | 07/09/07
|
|
Yep
pshannonwatts@... | 07/09/07
|
|
Microsoft/Novell would then violate GPLv3
PhilippeV | 07/09/07
|
|
For all practical purposes
Ole Man | 07/09/07
|
|
$ooooo very simple...
Media-Ted@... | 07/09/07
|
|
Microsoft's plans for you
Ole Man | 07/10/07
|
|
MISSING THE POINT
tomam | 07/10/07
|
|
Sooner than later, MS or Novell or whoever will
tek_heretik | 07/13/07
|
Doc delivers the scoop on today's enterprise content management, printer maintenance, and all other issues related to document management. It's the DocuMentor Blog.
The Business Essentials Guide provides you useful tools and templates to help grow your business and save you time with automated shipping solutions.
