Microsoft tries evading new GPL grasp
Loverock Davidson | 07/06/07
|

Haven't done your homework, eh Loverock?
Tony Agudo | 07/06/07
|
 
Loverock Needs To Read Groklaw
dumptux | 07/08/07
|
  
No need to
Loverock Davidson | 07/09/07
|
   
Sounds like what we always say!
DemonX | 07/09/07
|
    
How original
Loverock Davidson | 07/09/07
|
     
Nothing too much original here
PeterPilot | 07/10/07
|

" re-read their license?"
Ole Man | 07/09/07
|
Microsoft is NOT subject to the GPL?
ruped24 | 07/06/07
|

Yup
Tim Patterson | 07/08/07
|

It's all BSD and GPL 2.0 only
orcmid | 07/09/07
|
Re: Microsoft tries evading new GPL grasp
none none | 07/06/07
|
MS don't like you, and you don't like MS
Boot_Agnostic | 07/07/07
|
Rep has shown me the legal framework...
Mike Cox | 07/07/07
|

Funny to wath Billy and Stevie squirm. They would love to sue the snot out
DonnieBoy | 07/07/07
|

This "Legal Framework" May Have Consequences for MS
dumptux | 07/08/07
|
 
RE:This "Legal Framework" May Have Consequences for MS
joe6pack_z | 07/11/07
|
Microsoft Services for UNIX Discussion
stephe | 07/09/07
|
you'd think it were politics....
fireman949 | 07/09/07
|

oops.. see Loverocks posts for clarity (NT)
fireman949 | 07/09/07
|
 
Yep
pshannonwatts@... | 07/09/07
|
Microsoft/Novell would then violate GPLv3
PhilippeV | 07/09/07
|
For all practical purposes
Ole Man | 07/09/07
|
$ooooo very simple...
Media-Ted@... | 07/09/07
|
Microsoft's plans for you
Ole Man | 07/10/07
|
MISSING THE POINT
tomam | 07/10/07
|
Sooner than later, MS or Novell or whoever will
tek_heretik | 07/13/07
|