On mySimon: Joovy Caboose Ultralight Sunset
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 5 of 15:
Next »
« Previous
Uh, isn't that backwards
Sites designed for IE are the least compatible sites. Putting an active x control on a page targets a page for IE, so why put it, except that some people think most people use IE (which is true).
Wouldn't it be proactive to make pages to the standards and have them compatible to all browsers.
Posted by: el1jones   Posted on: 05/27/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Is it really necessary?  worknman | 05/27/04
Yeah OK...  Mike B_z | 05/27/04
I can understand that ...  worknman | 05/27/04
Well  Mike B_z | 05/27/04
Uh, isn't that backwards  el1jones | 05/27/04
That's all fine and dandy  Mike B_z | 05/27/04
Hmmm  Linux User 147560 | 05/27/04
find out for yourself  blahblahblah | 05/27/04
You obviously do not work in a corporate environment  BitTwiddler | 05/27/04
I used Opera  Linux User 147560 | 05/27/04
Correction....  Linux User 147560 | 05/27/04
Toolbars are often spyware in themselves!  ShadeTree | 05/27/04
You are right, and you are also VERY wrong  BitTwiddler | 05/27/04
hmmm...  philash | 05/27/04
That I will have to see  Ope | 05/28/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here