On mySimon: Toys of the Year Award Winners
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 36 of 64:
Next »
« Previous
Software as speech?
You wrote:
The Court has no authority over parties not before it. Good luck should that same court issue an order to all users of Linux.

A court might not issue an order to all users of Linux, but it can issue an order to the sellers/controllers of Linux.
Courts are used to having a response to their orders.


And I don't know that it's possible to patent speech, but software can be patented.
Here's a quote from a January 2004 BBC interview with Bruce Perens, who understands the encroaching threat of legal proceedings very well:


The biggest challenge that will face us after that is software patenting. Software patents that are being accepted are not necessarily inventions, their definitions are overbroad. And you can never finish a patent search. The definitions are so broad, you can't ever be sure a company would or would not assert their patent on what you are doing.

You have to consider engineers today spend their entire careers combining other people's intellectual property. And every small and medium sized enterprise is at risk regarding software patenting. That is a problem in Europe, because representatives to the European Parliament are pushing very hard for software patenting that would indeed shut out all small and medium businesses from the software development business, not just open source.

We're looking at a future where only the very largest companies will be able to implement software, and it will technically be illegal for other people to do so. That's a very, very bad situation developing. We must do something so that there is reason for people to innovate, there is reason for people to invent, but that companies can execute without this constant fear that we will be sued into the ground regarding software patenting.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 05/24/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I thought this was already done???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Why bother complaining?  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Replace your reading glasses Jeff.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
I'll defend No Axe on this one  Michael Kelly | 05/24/04
Yes but..  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
yes but...  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
No, it doesn't Bit  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Alpha not Beta  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
Jeff, are simply jealous?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Nothing to say Jeff? Big surprise... NOT!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Jeff, you really are confused.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Draw some air in btwn. yer double posting..try letting me respond first  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
So you openly admit to being a thief  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
Yes Bit -- that must have you and mommy running scared  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Last resort when losing... Call names.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Buwahahaha  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Well Itty  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Quite honestly...  Michael Kelly | 05/24/04
Didn't anybody READ the article?  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
re: Didn't anybody READ the article?  Iain_Peters | 05/24/04
Planting the seeds for an open future.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/24/04
Extra protection  Tim Patterson | 05/24/04
That smell is illegal in much of the world.  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Taking responsibility for Linux  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Good post (first few lines) ... but  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
More agreement than you might think  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
I will take the first few lines.  doe_z | 05/24/04
That's disappointing.  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
I like it better this way.  doe_z | 05/24/04
Exaggerating  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Views are not too far apart.  doe_z | 05/24/04
Could you summary?  doe_z | 05/24/04
Real Estate, Manufacturing, and Publishing  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/24/04
Remember Judge Motz's injunction on Java?  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Still don't get publishing, eh?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/24/04
Software as speech?  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Not quite connecting?  IT_User | 05/24/04
Specifics vs generalities  Anton Philidor | 05/25/04
I cant be the only one  zijiang | 05/24/04
What a mess, no rules, no guidelines until now?  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
You didn't read the article either!  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
The system was broken  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
You can't like yourself then  Iain_Peters | 05/24/04
13 year long pet college project  nucrash | 05/24/04
You mean...  Fred Fredrickson | 05/24/04
look a new troll  ryusen | 05/24/04
Let the lawsuits begin  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
Aw, come on now.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Ax, say hello to the new D A E M O N  Monkey_MCSE | 05/24/04
:o)  Iain_Peters | 05/24/04
You are making a fool of yourself ...  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
The monkey is on you  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
No, you accomplished it all on your own  IT_User | 05/24/04
Unreal nerve to do this...  Mike Cox | 05/24/04
kind of a rush job?  ryusen | 05/24/04
Going out on a limb?  IT_User | 05/24/04
Sign of the Times  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
What will it mean to the Linux developer?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
I'd think so  Michael Kelly | 05/24/04
Why stop there?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/24/04
Read the agreement, what does it say?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Don't see how it is different from before?  doe_z | 05/24/04
Aw, but you can no longer plead ignorance.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/25/04
So how is this different from the proprietary world?  George Mitchell | 05/25/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement