On GameSpot: Super Street Fighter IV confirmed!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 31 of 64:
Next »
« Previous
Views are not too far apart.
Large companies like IBM and specialized companies like Red Hat are also significant.

Yes, they are a VERY significant part of the equation. But the point I was getting at was MS is a software company and developing software is supposed to be their niche. These other guys aren't supposed to be as much into software as MS. RedHat is primarily support, and IBM is hardware. Contributing to Linux is secondary to them. But, they were able to combine with many others and produce a product that is on close level with MS. That is impressive. And, yeah, I think of it as a form of outsourcing.

But if they give an order concerning Linux, it's hard for me to think they would accept back an answer that no one has control, so nothing can be done.

Well, people do have control and orders can be carried out. The original authors of the code are responsible for it being legit. They are responsible in complying with any court orders that pertain to their code. So, something can be done. If a company has a problem, everything is there for them to see, and they can pin point who did the wrong doing and seek the correct legal path. The new rules make it a little easier now.

Court cases are expensive and complicated and time consuming. Representation is paid by the hour...

Too true, everything needs money. I think this is where the OSDL comes in. They aren't a party in the suit, but they are one of the supporters. Code and money aren't the only things companies can donate to Linux. They can donate legal services. Instead of individual programmers, they can donate to the OSDL which will manage the donations and allocate them to the programmers that need it.

I'm looking at only the impact of these facts on Linux, and I think the community is going to have to organize itself to meet the challenges

Reorganize... yeah, I can agree with that. But I don't think Linux will ever be controlled by one entity. The GPL doesn't allow it. There have to be middlemen; those who are the Hermes between the community and the entities that want to talk to them. And I think the OSDL fits in well. But the responsibility always has and always will rest on the individuals in the community who own the code.
Posted by: doe_z   Posted on: 05/24/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I thought this was already done???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Why bother complaining?  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Replace your reading glasses Jeff.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
I'll defend No Axe on this one  Michael Kelly | 05/24/04
Yes but..  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
yes but...  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
No, it doesn't Bit  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Alpha not Beta  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
Jeff, are simply jealous?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Nothing to say Jeff? Big surprise... NOT!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Jeff, you really are confused.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Draw some air in btwn. yer double posting..try letting me respond first  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
So you openly admit to being a thief  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
Yes Bit -- that must have you and mommy running scared  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Last resort when losing... Call names.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Buwahahaha  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Well Itty  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Quite honestly...  Michael Kelly | 05/24/04
Didn't anybody READ the article?  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
re: Didn't anybody READ the article?  Iain_Peters | 05/24/04
Planting the seeds for an open future.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/24/04
Extra protection  Tim Patterson | 05/24/04
That smell is illegal in much of the world.  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Taking responsibility for Linux  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Good post (first few lines) ... but  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
More agreement than you might think  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
I will take the first few lines.  doe_z | 05/24/04
That's disappointing.  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
I like it better this way.  doe_z | 05/24/04
Exaggerating  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Views are not too far apart.  doe_z | 05/24/04
Could you summary?  doe_z | 05/24/04
Real Estate, Manufacturing, and Publishing  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/24/04
Remember Judge Motz's injunction on Java?  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Still don't get publishing, eh?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/24/04
Software as speech?  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Not quite connecting?  IT_User | 05/24/04
Specifics vs generalities  Anton Philidor | 05/25/04
I cant be the only one  zijiang | 05/24/04
What a mess, no rules, no guidelines until now?  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
You didn't read the article either!  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
The system was broken  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
You can't like yourself then  Iain_Peters | 05/24/04
13 year long pet college project  nucrash | 05/24/04
You mean...  Fred Fredrickson | 05/24/04
look a new troll  ryusen | 05/24/04
Let the lawsuits begin  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
Aw, come on now.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Ax, say hello to the new D A E M O N  Monkey_MCSE | 05/24/04
:o)  Iain_Peters | 05/24/04
You are making a fool of yourself ...  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
The monkey is on you  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
No, you accomplished it all on your own  IT_User | 05/24/04
Unreal nerve to do this...  Mike Cox | 05/24/04
kind of a rush job?  ryusen | 05/24/04
Going out on a limb?  IT_User | 05/24/04
Sign of the Times  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
What will it mean to the Linux developer?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
I'd think so  Michael Kelly | 05/24/04
Why stop there?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/24/04
Read the agreement, what does it say?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Don't see how it is different from before?  doe_z | 05/24/04
Aw, but you can no longer plead ignorance.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/25/04
So how is this different from the proprietary world?  George Mitchell | 05/25/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Meet Doc