On mySimon: Magno Wooden AM/FM Radios
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 26 of 64:
Next »
« Previous
More agreement than you might think
You wrote:
People will still make money writing software and people who are very good at writing software will still make lots of money.

I'd see no problems with open source at all if that were entirely true.
The idea of competition for Microsoft is good; the idea of eliminating jobs and lowering income is bad. The problem for me is the dominance of Mr. Stallman's ideas in the open source model. Even some people who disagree with him, consider his ideas off the wall, further his plans like lemmings pushing on to the cliff.
So, I'll just agree with your statement, and hope that everyone involved considers the impact of their actions on salaries and employment.


You also wrote:
So what happens if foreign courts refuse to enforce IP laws? How is this problem different with free software than with proprietary software? What happens if a foreign court refuses to crack down on piracy? Answer: Piracy continues and offended countries use trade and diplomacy to try to bring the offending country into line. And ... duh ... same answer with free software.

Okay.
My point is, though, that there is now an organization responsible for Linux which is subject to court action. Free software coming to resemble proprietary, as you say.
My questions were about what happens when a court tries to enlist that organization as a means of getting an a company/country outside its jurisdiction to comply.
If I'm reading you correctly, you'd agree that just like a proprietary company, the organization responsible for Linux would place restrictions on its use anywhere in the world.
That's a real tightening of control, I think.
We're seeing changes in response to the real world. That's not a criticism of Linux, but it does show ideas about open source are being modified.
Posted by: Anton Philidor   Posted on: 05/24/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

I thought this was already done???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Why bother complaining?  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Replace your reading glasses Jeff.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
I'll defend No Axe on this one  Michael Kelly | 05/24/04
Yes but..  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
yes but...  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
No, it doesn't Bit  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Alpha not Beta  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
Jeff, are simply jealous?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Nothing to say Jeff? Big surprise... NOT!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Jeff, you really are confused.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Draw some air in btwn. yer double posting..try letting me respond first  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
So you openly admit to being a thief  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
Yes Bit -- that must have you and mommy running scared  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Last resort when losing... Call names.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Buwahahaha  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Well Itty  Jeff Spicoli | 05/24/04
Quite honestly...  Michael Kelly | 05/24/04
Didn't anybody READ the article?  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
re: Didn't anybody READ the article?  Iain_Peters | 05/24/04
Planting the seeds for an open future.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/24/04
Extra protection  Tim Patterson | 05/24/04
That smell is illegal in much of the world.  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Taking responsibility for Linux  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Good post (first few lines) ... but  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
More agreement than you might think  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
I will take the first few lines.  doe_z | 05/24/04
That's disappointing.  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
I like it better this way.  doe_z | 05/24/04
Exaggerating  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Views are not too far apart.  doe_z | 05/24/04
Could you summary?  doe_z | 05/24/04
Real Estate, Manufacturing, and Publishing  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/24/04
Remember Judge Motz's injunction on Java?  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Still don't get publishing, eh?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/24/04
Software as speech?  Anton Philidor | 05/24/04
Not quite connecting?  IT_User | 05/24/04
Specifics vs generalities  Anton Philidor | 05/25/04
I cant be the only one  zijiang | 05/24/04
What a mess, no rules, no guidelines until now?  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
You didn't read the article either!  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
The system was broken  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
You can't like yourself then  Iain_Peters | 05/24/04
13 year long pet college project  nucrash | 05/24/04
You mean...  Fred Fredrickson | 05/24/04
look a new troll  ryusen | 05/24/04
Let the lawsuits begin  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
Aw, come on now.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Ax, say hello to the new D A E M O N  Monkey_MCSE | 05/24/04
:o)  Iain_Peters | 05/24/04
You are making a fool of yourself ...  George Mitchell | 05/24/04
The monkey is on you  Enterprise Analyst | 05/24/04
No, you accomplished it all on your own  IT_User | 05/24/04
Unreal nerve to do this...  Mike Cox | 05/24/04
kind of a rush job?  ryusen | 05/24/04
Going out on a limb?  IT_User | 05/24/04
Sign of the Times  ShadeTree | 05/24/04
What will it mean to the Linux developer?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
I'd think so  Michael Kelly | 05/24/04
Why stop there?  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/24/04
Read the agreement, what does it say?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/24/04
Don't see how it is different from before?  doe_z | 05/24/04
Aw, but you can no longer plead ignorance.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/25/04
So how is this different from the proprietary world?  George Mitchell | 05/25/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads