On CBS MoneyWatch: Why Gift Cards Are Lousy Gifts
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 34 of 36:
Next »
« Previous
Microsoft Windows 2008
Microsoft speakers at a conference in Olympia Washington last week portrayed how Microsoft is responding and it is good.

The hypervisor Microsoft got with a purchase and is available free for download gives each virtual machine its own CPU when there are multiple CPUs on a server. This has now been changed.

When Widows 2008 is released a new hypervisor that load balances between virtual machines will be provided. It is one of the children from the Novell Microsoft marriage. The only draw back is that you have to have all 64 bit CPUs in your multi processor multicore server. The work around, I confirmed, will be XEN.

The main point is that Windows Server 2008 (Longhorn) will not load on top of the hardware. It will load as a virtual operating system product on top of a hypervisor that takes advantage of the AMD or Intel provided virtual capabilities that come as firmware or through open source contributions. The security improvements of this model should be obvious to all readers by now.

A secondary point or conclusion is that Windows 2008 is a re branding of Mictosoft (SUSE) Linux. Widows 2008 is getting its multicore capabilities via technology normally associated with SUSE Linux. You come to that conclusion after finding SUSE Linux intertwined in Windows 2008 Server. For example, the same administrative console is used to control virtual SUSE Linux and virtual Windows 2008.

The conference attendees got confirmation that Windows Server 2008 will use the same "new" core as Vista which will be rolled out as a service pack.

Bottom line - It took a sledge hammer to the nogan but Microsoft management is turning the Microsoft battleship towards less rough seas.
Posted by: mighetto   Posted on: 05/28/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The size of software is following  bjbrock | 05/25/07
Curious, what has this to do  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/25/07
It's why software is not  bjbrock | 05/25/07
Well, obviously the "power"  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/25/07
The second paragraph  bjbrock | 05/25/07
That would be Parkinson's Law  John L. Ries | 05/25/07
Bingo  Jack-Booted EULA | 05/28/07
Interesting... Fear of patents stiffling software performance innovation?  Basic Logic | 05/26/07
perhaps  CobraA1 | 05/27/07
You're not a programmer, are you? happy  wolf_z | 05/26/07
There is some truth to this  John L. Ries | 05/26/07
Not that easy to do really.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/25/07
It Comes down  Stuka | 05/25/07
You write to what's available  John Zern | 05/25/07
Hypocrisy from Intel  Robert.Novak@... | 05/25/07
Only cheap  Stuka | 05/25/07
Windows and Linux run on the same Intel (or AMD) hardware.  HypnoToad72 | 05/25/07
I think  Suicida| | 05/25/07
This is where Linux outshines Windows.  linux for me | 05/26/07
You're absolutely right HypnoToad72  GeiselS@... | 05/27/07
Contrasting hardware and software  kmatzen@... | 05/25/07
And this is news, or a law?! Sounds more like forgotten common sense.  HypnoToad72 | 05/25/07
Back in the days . . .  Ken_z | 05/26/07
Anyone Remember the AMIGA ?  GeiselS@... | 05/26/07
Yes, I remember how slow they were.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/26/07
You obviously didn't own one  GeiselS@... | 05/27/07
As usual  wgraue | 06/03/07
At least part of the problem is...  Henry Miller | 05/27/07
Why?  in-DUH-vidual | 05/27/07
No Moore's Law?  Grayson Peddie | 05/27/07
Don't know  in-DUH-vidual | 05/28/07
The thing about Moore's Law...  Wolfie2K3 | 05/29/07
Exotic tasks  in-DUH-vidual | 05/30/07
Microsoft Windows 2008  mighetto | 05/28/07
back in '90 i hada chance to write a PPprogram in Fortran for a connection  wessonjoe | 05/29/07
All is about optimization  PhilippeV | 06/01/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here