On GameSpot: The top games of the 2000s so far?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 22 of 36:
Next »
« Previous
And this is news, or a law?! Sounds more like forgotten common sense.
Thanks to the 'advances' of storage capacities, operating system and software designers felt they could write less efficient or bulkier code.

It seemed obvious from day 1 that would mean slower performance. And by day 1 I mean the mid-1980s as Windows started "evolving" (more like bloating into Fat Albert) whereas other platforms (such as the Commodore Amiga) retained small footprints and boasted more use of efficient languages such as Assembly language with tightly written code.

After all, in the days of punched cards, nobody wanted to handle any more of them than possible...

And "things are better on the server side" solely because they use SCSI architecture and SMP (multiple processors). Whatever happened to the idea of using unused CPU cycles on workstation nodes?

The same can be said for oil, and why nobody's shifting away from it as fast as possible. The technologies DO exist.

Mind you, at the time when I pointed out these foibles to people, I was laughed at - much for the same reason; why not use all the extra memory and hard drive space? Nobody grasped the idea that tighter code usually means better performance and less chance of faulty/failing code. It's not a magical new thought. It's common sense that goes back long before computers were thought of: Using resources as wisely as possible and not caving to gluttony at every opportunity.

Remember the mindset of the majority at the time. And the sales pitch of those selling the dominant platforms.

Borkar can say what he wants. Whether the world follows him is another. And why does the article make him sound like a deity anyway?
Posted by: HypnoToad72   Posted on: 05/25/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

The size of software is following  bjbrock | 05/25/07
Curious, what has this to do  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/25/07
It's why software is not  bjbrock | 05/25/07
Well, obviously the "power"  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/25/07
The second paragraph  bjbrock | 05/25/07
That would be Parkinson's Law  John L. Ries | 05/25/07
Bingo  Jack-Booted EULA | 05/28/07
Interesting... Fear of patents stiffling software performance innovation?  Basic Logic | 05/26/07
perhaps  CobraA1 | 05/27/07
You're not a programmer, are you? happy  wolf_z | 05/26/07
There is some truth to this  John L. Ries | 05/26/07
Not that easy to do really.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/25/07
It Comes down  Stuka | 05/25/07
You write to what's available  John Zern | 05/25/07
Hypocrisy from Intel  Robert.Novak@... | 05/25/07
Only cheap  Stuka | 05/25/07
Windows and Linux run on the same Intel (or AMD) hardware.  HypnoToad72 | 05/25/07
I think  Suicida| | 05/25/07
This is where Linux outshines Windows.  linux for me | 05/26/07
You're absolutely right HypnoToad72  GeiselS@... | 05/27/07
Contrasting hardware and software  kmatzen@... | 05/25/07
And this is news, or a law?! Sounds more like forgotten common sense.  HypnoToad72 | 05/25/07
Back in the days . . .  Ken_z | 05/26/07
Anyone Remember the AMIGA ?  GeiselS@... | 05/26/07
Yes, I remember how slow they were.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/26/07
You obviously didn't own one  GeiselS@... | 05/27/07
As usual  wgraue | 06/03/07
At least part of the problem is...  Henry Miller | 05/27/07
Why?  in-DUH-vidual | 05/27/07
No Moore's Law?  Grayson Peddie | 05/27/07
Don't know  in-DUH-vidual | 05/28/07
The thing about Moore's Law...  Wolfie2K3 | 05/29/07
Exotic tasks  in-DUH-vidual | 05/30/07
Microsoft Windows 2008  mighetto | 05/28/07
back in '90 i hada chance to write a PPprogram in Fortran for a connection  wessonjoe | 05/29/07
All is about optimization  PhilippeV | 06/01/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement

Meet Doc