On The Insider: White House Party Crashers Won't Testify
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 13 of 202:
Next »
« Previous
Why do you assume that?
Just for arguments sake, lets say there was a suit beteen Red Hat and MS (Doesn't matter who files.)

Why do you make the assumption that the information disclosed in a trial would be public knowledge?
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 05/22/07 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

Microsoft: No plans to sue over Linux patents  Loverock Davidson | 05/22/07
Quite to the contrary. The best thing for Linux would be if MS were to file  DonnieBoy | 05/22/07
That would be best for MS  Loverock Davidson | 05/22/07
And that would be fine.  Patrick Jones | 05/22/07
Sure would be  Loverock Davidson | 05/22/07
Not likely....  linux for me | 05/23/07
Very likely  Loverock Davidson | 05/23/07
And, just what is the address of the "Linux" that thy will sue??  DonnieBoy | 05/22/07
RTP, NC  Loverock Davidson | 05/22/07
last time i checked  Monkey_MCSE | 05/22/07
Last time I checked  Loverock Davidson | 05/22/07
Well DUH! (reply to LD)  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
Why do you assume that?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Because of the freedom of information act...  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
Nope, any participant can ask that the inforrmation  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Uhh Yup!  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
For reasons cited  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/22/07
Patents are Public Documents  WiredGuy | 05/22/07
Oh Right,  Rocker452 | 05/23/07
I see no one squirming...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Donnie . . .  JLHenry | 05/23/07
Feels like I am talking to, talkin to  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
You would know better than anyone.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
I asked you because I have no idea  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
Idiot? Don't forget flaming racist.  Jack-Booted EULA | 05/23/07
Did nt, DId too  jescocom | 05/23/07
So true...even the idiots know better than to follow someone with 'no ax'..  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
You tell me  Loverock Davidson | 05/22/07
thats funny..  Monkey_MCSE | 05/22/07
Again, my point is proved  Loverock Davidson | 05/23/07
Well, if you ever ARE right, I'll be sure to let you know  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
I Agree  Rocker452 | 05/23/07
That's the point.  Rocker452 | 05/23/07
You've NEVER proved anything!  linux for me | 05/23/07
Sure I have  Loverock Davidson | 05/23/07
I think I speak for the majority when I say...  Zeppo9191 | 05/23/07
Get real. MS won't because doing so would hurt their largest customers.  HypnoToad72 | 05/22/07
Not quite  Loverock Davidson | 05/23/07
This is quite a change from your earlier posts on the subject  Zeppo9191 | 05/23/07
Anybody remember Windows for Workgroups?  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Well gosh, golly, gee!  phburks | 05/23/07
Well gosh  Loverock Davidson | 05/23/07
How can I argue ...  phburks | 05/23/07
You can't  Loverock Davidson | 05/23/07
Check your dosage, Lovey -  deleweye | 05/23/07
I hate to be the one to point it out...  Zeppo9191 | 05/23/07
Thanks Captain Obvious  phburks | 05/24/07
Man are you delusional.  Rocker452 | 05/23/07
M$ involvment at ANY level with Linux is a perversion  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Oil Companies?  markdean | 05/23/07
Don't be so quick  DaChSa | 05/23/07
Maybe I was a bit harsh but...  markdean | 05/23/07
" to make it simple for those who don't understand"  Ole Man | 05/23/07
Cool  markdean | 05/23/07
It's like trying to prove air to a dead man  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Wow! Great synopsis!  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
And I'll make it even simpler for you who think you DO understand  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Yes, OIL COMPANIES!!! What don't you understand?  phburks | 05/24/07
Software Patents are BOGUS  fordomatic69@... | 05/23/07
MS shot itmself in the foot.. here is why..  Northwolf | 05/23/07
Snatch, Grab, Yank!  WasntBornYesterdayForSure | 05/23/07
This is just like reading a Mike Cox post...  nix_hed | 05/23/07
Hilarius to watch them try to dance around this issue.  DonnieBoy | 05/22/07
Or more likely the case  GuidingLight | 05/22/07
Hiding from what?  TripleII | 05/23/07
Like a rooster crowing at the moon  Ole Man | 05/23/07
Albeit by accident, you're exactly right...  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
What in teh world are you talking about, its Linux REACTING  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
another funny...  Monkey_MCSE | 05/22/07
Wow, spoken like a true monkey...  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Better that crowd's "wet match"  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Love to watch Monkey Boy dance . . .  Basic Logic | 05/22/07
I like watching all the open source zealots  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
"Cows or Chairs" - - - I'd say it's a draw. (nt)  Basic Logic | 05/22/07
Translation: No_Ax is a self-confessed Troll.  Zogg | 05/23/07
Hilarius to watch them try to dance around this issue  PeterPilot | 05/23/07
What's "Hilarious" is your spelling mistake?  codeguy007 | 05/25/07
Well since they stated they wouldnt pursue patent infringements...  mrlinux | 05/22/07
No  Patrick Jones | 05/22/07
If you know of patent infrigments and dont defend them...  mrlinux | 05/23/07
Not completely true..  Patrick Jones | 05/23/07
According to Microsoft they have the evidence...  mrlinux | 05/23/07
Read again...  FatherJ | 05/25/07
You need to read again, they said "for now".  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Do you ever take your own advice?  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
When you see it happen  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
You can't be that stupid!  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
Faith in the face of facts  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/22/07
Read patent law it is also fundamental  mrlinux | 05/23/07
hey genius...  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Are you new???  nomorems | 05/22/07
Question...  Patrick Jones | 05/22/07
Probably not  voska | 05/22/07
Maybe..  Patrick Jones | 05/22/07
Do your self a favor,  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Never planned on it  Patrick Jones | 05/23/07
Yeah, you probably have a point...  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Probably so...  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Nope,  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Never going to happen anyway.  odubtaig | 05/22/07
IBM can NOT put a dog in the fight.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Wrong yet again, oh Great Poobah!  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Huh?  Patrick Jones | 05/23/07
And...  Patrick Jones | 05/23/07
You're so wrong...  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Has anyone thought ........  uM0p ap!sdn | 05/24/07
..........  Shelendrea | 05/22/07
Not quite true.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
here's the real information  sjaaxken | 05/23/07
Well, if I had to pick one or the other...  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
I'd have to go with the latter.........  uM0p ap!sdn | 05/24/07
You have a point.  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Actually, it sets MS up to lose any case - - - Failure to enforce.  Basic Logic | 05/22/07
On what planet  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Get a law book and read about the "doctrine of latches" (nt)  Basic Logic | 05/22/07
Laches  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/22/07
Also research A.C. Auckerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co. . .  Basic Logic | 05/22/07
Irrelevant  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/22/07
Reminds me of that other thinking  not of this world | 05/22/07
Does anyone here play poker?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Sometimes, however...  tic swayback | 05/22/07
MS needs a wounded/restrained linux, not a dead linux.  enduser_z | 05/22/07
To dovetail your post a bit...  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
Did you see the news about Soros and MS?  enduser_z | 05/22/07
Time to lobby against him!  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
So Democrats are saints?  GuidingLight | 05/22/07
Dems victory = Al Qaeda running amok too!  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Oh! I get it now!  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
not muc of a poker player, are you?  B.O.F.H. | 05/22/07
ROFLMAO  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Dude, learn how to play poker!  B.O.F.H. | 05/22/07
Anytime you think you can sit at my table say so.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Aw No_Ax_to_Grind had to go look something up!  B.O.F.H. | 05/22/07
Message has been deleted.  nomorems | 05/22/07
Why would we even WANT to sit at your table?  1stcyberian | 05/24/07
You ARE putting us on right? RIGHT?!!  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Does anyone here play poker?  uM0p ap!sdn | 05/24/07
WHY hasn't Linux already removed teh infringed IP?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Evidence?  odubtaig | 05/22/07
All on the FSF web site.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
That site does not help your arguement.  B.O.F.H. | 05/22/07
I guess you are slow huh?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Dude, your ability to interpret legal matters is amazing.  B.O.F.H. | 05/22/07
WHat is left to interpret.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Maybe you should be careful...  fr0thy2. | 05/24/07
I think you have it wrong  jumpingjjl | 05/23/07
Funny, that  Yagotta B. Kidding | 05/22/07
I agree, they removed it so no one can see it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Just cuyrious, how does that stop them from fising it?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Because MS is afraid to spell out what is infringed..  Basic Logic | 05/22/07
OSRM did it for them  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Among other reasons . . .  Basic Logic | 05/22/07
THat is a side issue to my question.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
perhas? prior art will inalidate many + ms infringes on some of theirs  jjarman | 05/23/07
Get a clue  Rocker452 | 05/23/07
You knew the answer - - - Why did you ask ? ? ? (nt)  Basic Logic | 05/22/07
Ummm, to wipe the smuggness  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
you miss 1 simple word  Monkey_MCSE | 05/22/07
I note your get out of jail phrase...  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
You must be REALLY slow.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
No, always one step ahead of you...  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
Dude, i could give you a week headstart  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Sorry but you be wrong  Linux User 147560 | 05/22/07
Now I know you are blowing smoke.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
less you forget  TheHonestTruth | 05/22/07
Stop with the MS arguments, they don't apply...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Possible doesn't mean it is  voska | 05/23/07
Axxie  Bite Me_Ax_Moron | 05/27/07
They weren't valid  TripleII | 05/23/07
FUD only works as a threat  code_flogger | 05/23/07
Protection Money  jorjitop | 05/22/07
Right on the mark!  George Mitchell | 05/22/07
Exactly!  DarbyOhara | 05/23/07
Microsoft is desperate for a new revenue stream  jorjitop | 05/22/07
So, they're going to try to emulate the "SCO Source" program ????  Basic Logic | 05/22/07
Buwahahahahahahaha  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
There there, now  Ole Man | 05/23/07
Legalized Extortion - - Congress should shut down this kind of stuff.  Basic Logic | 05/22/07
Yes, give MS back every penny  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
Agree - - to a point. . .  Basic Logic | 05/22/07
Ok, as long as *I*  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/22/07
M$ existing patent portfolio is already GPL'd !!  thetruth_z | 05/22/07
An interesting conundrum for Microsoft  WiredGuy | 05/22/07
All patents must die [nt]  Omch'Ar | 05/22/07
A liars must be prosecuted and expunged !  nomorems | 05/22/07
Sue if they have real claim, STFU if they don't  Boot_Agnostic | 05/23/07
This is Microsoft versus RedHat ...  mwagner@... | 05/23/07
Schwartz says Sun prepared to defend Red Hat  WiredGuy | 05/23/07
mutually assured destruction, junk patents  cls@... | 05/23/07
M$ decides to fold their junk hand.  Old Timer 8080 | 05/23/07
I have a Time mag' from 1997 where...  tek_heretik | 05/23/07
RE: bootable Raid0 Linux driver for ICH7R  btljooz | 05/23/07
I think you have it wrong  jumpingjjl | 05/23/07
I remember!  kmyat | 05/23/07
Microsoft Tries To Make It Sound Like They Are Doing Us A Favor!  chessmen | 05/23/07
Smoke and Mirrors  djchandler | 05/23/07
Red Flag  code_flogger | 05/23/07
M$ still doing the 'same ol, same ol', and it still works.  1stcyberian | 05/23/07
Translated: "Our new type of FUD didn't work"  critic-at-arms | 05/23/07
Crazy  cra69_2000@... | 05/24/07
More FUD  blarman_z | 05/24/07
They should speak quietly with their big stick  bdulaney@... | 05/25/07

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

SmartPlanet

Click Here