On TechRepublic: 10 lame phrases to cut from your resume
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 10 of 60:
Next »
« Previous
Um they are the ones claiming to be "open"...
When you make claims that everything is above board and you are "open" about everything, don't whine when someone says let me look for myself...
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind   Posted on: 05/20/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

(NT) Grasping at straws. How sad.  James T. Kirk | 05/20/04
ROTLMAO.. I picture Darl doing a Rodney Dangerfield skit...  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/20/04
Of course they said no  jdunn_z | 05/20/04
"Forced expenses"?  psuedostratified | 05/20/04
Absolutely  James T. Kirk | 05/20/04
Yeah I would  voska | 05/20/04
Most excellent post!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/20/04
BULL.  doe_z | 05/20/04
They are protecting their rights???  IT_User | 05/20/04
Um they are the ones claiming to be "open"...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/20/04
you remember what they claim is open?  ryusen | 05/20/04
Oh, let's look shall we???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/20/04
what ethical questions are being questioned?  ryusen | 05/20/04
This is dealing with SCO, remember?  IT_User | 05/20/04
software vs correspondence  CobraA1 | 05/20/04
talk about misleading:  ryusen | 05/20/04
Re: talk  issthatso | 05/20/04
or  blahblahblah | 05/21/04
Yeah but this is ZDnet reporting  Albee_Freeoneday | 05/21/04
We have nothing to hide????  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/20/04
EVERYBODY has something to hide  Michael Kelly | 05/20/04
Makes no difference.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/20/04
For someone with 'No Axe to Grind' ...  George Mitchell | 05/20/04
the SCO "support group"  blahblahblah | 05/20/04
They're all just so fishy!  George Mitchell | 05/21/04
N A G  LongShipUser | 05/21/04
Way to go...  wploger | 05/20/04
No, I have a problem with...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/20/04
Oh good lord  wploger | 05/20/04
Pardon me???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/20/04
And if your knowledge is zero  Iain_Peters | 05/20/04
precisely  blahblahblah | 05/20/04
Hmm...  LongShipUser | 05/21/04
Of course  IT_User | 05/20/04
hmm  blahblahblah | 05/20/04
Excuse me!  George Mitchell | 05/20/04
They have nothing to look for  Robert Crocker | 05/20/04
buying time before the stock totally dies  blahblahblah | 05/21/04
here we go...  blahblahblah | 05/20/04
source open but not the secret dealings  dg mh | 05/20/04
From your lips...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/20/04
cleanliness  blahblahblah | 05/21/04
What is FSF hiding from???  BFD | 05/20/04
I agree, for all the claims of "openness"...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/20/04
FUD mode engaged...  Fred Fredrickson | 05/20/04
"for all the claims.... "  kd4yum@... | 05/20/04
Who doesn't have 'fish in the water'?  George Mitchell | 05/20/04
by that logic  blahblahblah | 05/21/04
or could it be....  ryusen | 05/20/04
So what?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/20/04
then let the court decide...  ryusen | 05/20/04
What are you?  jjon2121 | 05/20/04
Poor Bitty  Fred Fredrickson | 05/21/04
Re: So what? & "I see ZERO difference..."  jezter~ | 05/21/04
This isn't strange.  doe_z | 05/20/04
Oh, shades of Look and Feel!  kd4yum@... | 05/20/04
Looking at the subpoena  Robert Crocker | 05/20/04
Yes  IT_User | 05/20/04
Ping: No_Ax_to_Grind  boatelc | 05/20/04
wet seats at Redmond  jellyclock | 05/21/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement