On TV.com: Who?ll Replace OPRAH as Our Life Coach?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet
TalkBack 17 of 27:
Next »
« Previous
Sorry, my bad
Oops, mixed up your two cases there.

In the case of Sun, I believe there hadn't yet been a verdict in
their US case against MS (filed in March '02) when the whole EU
business was going on. Clearly this doesn't fit the bill of what
you were implying, that they had already lost their US case
before "crying to the EU" because the US court had not yet ruled.
They settled quite nicely and made a ton of money off the case,
and I think they are satisfied with how the US case came out.

As for Real filing in California, they claim it's because most of
their witnesses are in the Silicon Valley (I can't vouch for the
validity of this), but expect the case to be moved to Baltimore:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/
2001819201_real190.html

The lawsuit was filed in federal court in San Jose, Calif.
RealNetworks executives said they chose Silicon Valley because
it is home to a number of witnesses who have seen firsthand the
impact of Microsoft's predatory practices.

"We felt very comfortable that when a jury is able to see the
entire story and hear the witnesses, they're going to conclude
that Microsoft has once again violated the antitrust laws," said
RealNetworks general counsel Robert Kimball.

San Jose is also where Sun filed its Microsoft case in March
2002. That case was moved to a federal court in Baltimore that
was hearing other private antitrust cases.

RealNetworks expects its case to be moved to Baltimore as well,
though it would likely come back to California once a trial
begins.

Microsoft's Smith had not decided whether to ask to move the
case to another court. "I was surprised that one Seattle company
is going to California to sue another Seattle company," he said.
"There is a federal courthouse in Seattle."
Posted by: tic swayback   Posted on: 05/11/04 You are currently: a Guest | Members login | Terms of Use

Alert moderator to an offensive message

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

dutch court?  blahblahblah | 05/11/04
Lindows who???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/11/04
(NT) Isn't that what Microsoft said about Liberty Alliance ???  Plain Logic | 05/11/04
Liberyt Alliance? Oh you mean...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/11/04
MS shill spews again  Spam-ZD | 05/11/04
Another case of Microsoft's anti-competitive behavior  Linux_Developer | 05/11/04
Big statement, now prove it.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/11/04
MS has never been original  Spam-ZD | 05/11/04
NOTHING to do with "protecting a trademark"  IT_User | 05/12/04
Ah, wait a minute.  Linux_Developer | 05/12/04
Lindows in Dutch  georgep_z | 05/11/04
Let's see the Anderson's and other Mfgrs sue MS!!  IT-professional | 05/11/04
Terms  tic swayback | 05/11/04
Contempt inspires contempt  Jay Cash | 05/11/04
You mean like Real whining to the EU?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 05/11/04
You have your timeline mixed up  tic swayback | 05/11/04
Sorry, my bad  tic swayback | 05/11/04
of course...  ryusen | 05/11/04
Funny thing  IT_User | 05/11/04
MS shill spews again...  Spam-ZD | 05/11/04
Contempt of common expressions.  pj-xmesh | 05/11/04
what's funnier  tic swayback | 05/11/04
Uh Oh - the New York City subway's in big doodoo  j.m.galvin | 05/11/04
Axe, we missed you in the sasser discussions  jellyclock | 05/12/04
Lindows should never have existed in the first place.  Sniper_z | 05/13/04
Lindows should never have existed in the first place.Da  thomasmac | 05/13/04
I'm a christian and I use Linux  Mschel | 07/01/04

What do you think?

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

advertisement
advertisement

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline