Looks good...
Tim Patterson | 03/28/07
|

Cut off your nose to spite your face?
NonZealot | 03/28/07
|
 
Perhaps, perhaps not..
TtfnJohn | 03/28/07
|
GPL getting tougher on patent deals
Loverock Davidson | 03/28/07
|

Ristrictive? Compared to commercial software?
bspelcha@... | 03/28/07
|
 
re: Ristrictive? Compared to commercial software?
joe6pack_z | 03/28/07
|
  
Looks like someone is jealous of me (NT)
Loverock Davidson | 03/28/07
|
 
Comparing the wrong licenses
NonZealot | 03/28/07
|
 
GPL has always been restrictive
Loverock Davidson | 03/28/07
|
  
And if that code happens to be somebody elses?
pueblonative | 03/28/07
|
   
anonymous contributions are forbidden
PhilippeV | 03/29/07
|

GPL getting more power to restrict your rights.
jolumoar | 03/28/07
|
I think you mean 'less tough'
Resuna | 03/28/07
|
How Low Can You Go?
Ole Man | 03/28/07
|

If you didn't post the same three
xuniL_z | 03/28/07
|
 
Just the opposite of your contention
Ole Man | 03/29/07
|
It's not a news! A mere copy of the FSF's mail
PhilippeV | 03/28/07
|
Do you think that business on screwing the people (rights, freedom, etc.)..
Vily Clay | 03/28/07
|

wow...
doas777 | 03/29/07
|
 
er...spelling
doas777 | 03/29/07
|
  
Debating without logical reasons is a feature of animals and doas777. (NT)
Vily Clay | 03/29/07
|
 
Vily Clay's response if just offensive
PhilippeV | 03/29/07
|
  
Too soft in fact,cause? the truth is much worse,not many can handle it (NT)
Vily Clay | 03/29/07
|
Exactly. The GPL is a model
PhilippeV | 03/29/07
|
You're wrong, it's not a restriction
PhilippeV | 03/29/07
|

response was intended to bspelcha@...
PhilippeV | 03/29/07
|